Cookies are required for login or registration. Please read and agree to our cookie policy to continue.

Newest Member: Sunflower96

Off Topic :
Chemistry Nobel prize...

This Topic is Archived
default

 sisoon (original poster moderator #31240) posted at 5:58 PM on Thursday, October 10th, 2013

for modeling the results of experiments?

The map is not the territory. A model simply isn't an experiment.

I know the modeling is an important aid. I just hope this isn't a step on the slippery slope back to the days when 'science' was based on 'reason' and not observation.

fBH (me) - on d-day: 66, Married 43, together 45, same sex apDDay - 12/22/2010Recover'd and R'edYou don't have to like your boundaries. You just have to set and enforce them.

posts: 31119   ·   registered: Feb. 18th, 2011   ·   location: Illinois
id 6518498
default

SerJR ( member #14993) posted at 10:58 AM on Friday, October 11th, 2013

I don't believe it is. A few months back I was at NIST for a workshop on cement modeling. They are doing similar work - building models of the cement reactions (extrememly complex) from the atomic level up based upon fundamentals with computer models working towards material and then structural modeling (from micro to macro). The intent is to match theory up with observation. They are already seeing where the model and what we've believed for 60 years to be true not matching up in some areas, prompting re-evaluation of our understanding.

Theory and empirical data must match up, or else there exists an erronous assumption somewhere. This is a huge step forward in the field of chemistry.

Me: BH - Happily remarried.
Hope is never lost. It exists within you - it is real. It is not a force in and of itself - it is something that you create with every thought, action, and choice you make. It is a gift that you create for yourself.

posts: 18630   ·   registered: Jun. 15th, 2007   ·   location: Further North than South
id 6519466
default

gahurts ( member #33699) posted at 6:30 PM on Friday, October 11th, 2013

This really does not surprise me. Without getting political, it is the basis of the entire argument about global warming. The entire argument about man-made global warming is based on the results of computer climate models that predict a certain result. The problem with that is that those models cannot even predict the current state of the climate yet alone a future 100 years ahead of us.

Here is the link to an article about the prize in Chemical Processing Magazine. An industry trade journal

http://www.chemicalprocessing.com/industrynews/2013/video-nobel-prize-in-chemistry-for-2013-/

"Strength does not come from physical capacity. It comes from an indominable will" - Mahatma Gandi

"Courage is being scared to death and saddling up anyway." - Aubrie

posts: 3991   ·   registered: Oct. 22nd, 2011   ·   location: Georgia
id 6519993
default

 sisoon (original poster moderator #31240) posted at 6:35 PM on Friday, October 11th, 2013

Yeah, the award makes perfect sense. It's just way weird, since I was brought up on observation being the core of science.

fBH (me) - on d-day: 66, Married 43, together 45, same sex apDDay - 12/22/2010Recover'd and R'edYou don't have to like your boundaries. You just have to set and enforce them.

posts: 31119   ·   registered: Feb. 18th, 2011   ·   location: Illinois
id 6520001
This Topic is Archived
Cookies on SurvivingInfidelity.com®

SurvivingInfidelity.com® uses cookies to enhance your visit to our website. This is a requirement for participants to login, post and use other features. Visitors may opt out, but the website will be less functional for you.

v.1.001.20250404a 2002-2025 SurvivingInfidelity.com® All Rights Reserved. • Privacy Policy