This Topic is Archived
Not_4Ever? (original poster member #14837) posted at 8:44 PM on Monday, October 28th, 2013
After my divorce and the house was sold I rented a smaller older house. It's over priced,but the owner had no problem with my two Rotties so I took it.Now he ask if I'm interested in "Rent to Own. " I am interested but not for the same amount of rent I'm paying know. Has anyone experience with that ???? I know I would still pay him.
The secret to happieness is a good sense of humor and a bad memory!
Crescita ( member #32616) posted at 9:53 PM on Monday, October 28th, 2013
I've looked into it a bit, but never found it to be right for me.
From what I understand these scenarios tend to be friendlier to the seller than the buyer. The buyer is generally responsible for upkeep, and doesn't get any of the extra money back at the end of the term if they decide to walk away.
Not to say there aren't some advantages for the buyer, you would be well informed on the house and neighborhood, and if the market improves, you have already locked in at a lower price.
I'd decide how much you are willing to pay for a straight up rental and go from there. If you don't want to buy, and he is looking to sell, you will probably have to move soon anyway.
“Happiness cannot be pursued; it must ensue.” ― Viktor E. Frankl, Man's Search for Meaning
This Topic is Archived
