|
|
|
User
|
Topic: OW requests name stricken @ court?
|
FlySomeday
♀ 35150
Member # 35150 |  Posted: 3:50 PM, June 8th (Sunday), 2014 |     |
ANyone?? Ok, posting for a dear SI friend here. So, to clarify... Has anyone had the OW or OM show up in court to testify against BS and then after the fact ask that their name be redacted or stricken from the records and documents?? (just cause she wants it and cause I guess there are some things she said/did that society might not think are appropriate). Yes, we are talking about a custody/divorce case...not a murder here. Just asking. ANyone??
-Fly.
Digging Deep in the Mud
Posts: 232 | Registered: Mar 2012 | From: Virginia |
Lovedyoumore
♀ 35593
Member # 35593 | | Posted: 3:57 PM, June 8th (Sunday), 2014 | |
AP testifying against their own BS or against you?
Me 52
WH 52
Married 30+ years
Together trying to R
I tell people I am tired but really my heart is broken and I am sad.
Posts: 1705 | Registered: May 2012 | From: Southern, bless your heart |
FlySomeday
♀ 35150
Member # 35150 | | Posted: 3:59 PM, June 8th (Sunday), 2014 | |
OW testifying against other BS (not me).
Digging Deep in the Mud
Posts: 232 | Registered: Mar 2012 | From: Virginia |
Lovedyoumore
♀ 35593
Member # 35593 | | Posted: 4:22 PM, June 8th (Sunday), 2014 | |
I did not know you could have it redacted. Why would she do that? If it is a spousal custody case, even with name stricken, her identity would be known. That really does not make sense.
I do have a friend whose XH showed up ready to testify, with documentation, that she had been unfit. My friend showed up with witnesses to his parenting failures and her PI who tracked the XH carrying on with OW in front of both their children. Guess who got total custody? He got three weeks each summer and one weekend a month.
Me 52
WH 52
Married 30+ years
Together trying to R
I tell people I am tired but really my heart is broken and I am sad.
Posts: 1705 | Registered: May 2012 | From: Southern, bless your heart |
hurtbs
♀ 10866
Member # 10866 | | Posted: 4:28 PM, June 8th (Sunday), 2014 | |
The only reason the court will redact a witnesses name (they will never strike it) is if a) the witness is a minor or b) the witness has reason to fear for their safety (e.g. testifying against the mob or a very high profile case). This is rarely granted - a judge won't do it just because someone is embarrassed about screwing someone else's spouse.
Me BW Him XSAWH
DDays 2006, and then numerous more
Divorced 2012
"In life, unlike chess, the game continues after checkmate." - Asimov
"Be patient and tough; someday this pain will be useful to you." - Ovid
Posts: 15414 | Registered: Jun 2006 |
peridot
♀ 18334
Member # 18334 | | Posted: 5:20 PM, June 8th (Sunday), 2014 | |
I doubt it! 
I think...therefore, I'm single.
It is what it is.
Posts: 4824 | Registered: Feb 2008 |
kg201
♂ 40173
Member # 40173 | | Posted: 6:16 PM, June 8th (Sunday), 2014 | |
I mentioned the OMs name when my X filed the restraining order, and I fought it in court. His BS believes that is why he is being denied a judgeship. I feel really bad about that one. 
Me: BH, 40
Her: WW
Together 18 years, married 15+
LTA 3.5 years, living together
Dday: 7/28/13
Divorcing, 3 children
---------------------------------
"There can be no friendship without confidence, and no confidence without integrity." -S
Posts: 854 | Registered: Aug 2013 |
FlySomeday
♀ 35150
Member # 35150 | | Posted: 7:46 PM, June 8th (Sunday), 2014 | |
OMG KG! Feel really bad too! Sounds like a nice dose of karma. What cha gonna do.  No OM or OW should have a judgeship IMHO.
Digging Deep in the Mud
Posts: 232 | Registered: Mar 2012 | From: Virginia |
Gemini71
♀ 40115
Member # 40115 | | Posted: 8:50 PM, June 8th (Sunday), 2014 | |
Sounds like it's time to take a full page ad out with her name and a transcript of her testimony. But I'm bitchy that way. 
Edited to correct stupid typos.
Double Betrayal D-Day 7/26/2013
Divorced 11/18/2014
Two steps forward and one step backwards, is still progress.
Posts: 2264 | Registered: Jul 2013 | From: Illinois, USA |
Nature_Girl
♀ 32554
Member # 32554 | | Posted: 12:24 AM, June 9th (Monday), 2014 | |
Oh, the poor, poor OW has destroyed a family, and in doing so her despicable behavior will be part of the public record. Cry me a river, you stupid bee-yotch.
Me = BS (Stay-at-home-mom)
Him = EX-d out (abusive troglodyte NPD SA)
3 tween-aged kids
Together 20 years
D-Day: Memorial Weekend 2011
2013 - DIVORCED!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJgjyDFfJuU
Posts: 10308 | Registered: Jun 2011 | From: USA |
Compartmented
29410
Member # 29410 | | Posted: 7:29 AM, June 9th (Monday), 2014 | |
I say Actions...meet Consequences!
I think both sides might have to agree to seal some records...never heard about redacting someone's name. Why didn't she think about that before she said what she said, anyway? If she didn't want the publicity, why didn't she just refuse to testify for her affair partner?? Seems kinda' dumb to me.
Posts: 1416 | Registered: Aug 2010 |
| Topic Posts: 11 | |
