Cheating Hurt by Infidelity
Betrayal Wayward Donations lying
Welcome

Forums

Guidelines

Find a Local Counselor

The Healing Library

Media

Contact Us
lies
cover
In Association with Amazon.com
Support
Infidelity -
-
like us on facebook
You are not logged in. Login here or register.
[Register]
Newest Member: Heartbreaker1999 (45457)

Off Topic Post Reply     Print Topic    
User Topic: Potentially dumb question about airplanes
Jrazz
♀ Guide
Member # 31349
Default  Posted: 7:50 PM, March 9th (Sunday), 2014View ProfileEdit MessagePrivate MessageHomepage

Why isn't "black box" data transmitted automatically to a land-based site? When there are (rare) crashes, everyone's scrambling to find the black box. Can't the data be translated into something simple and instantaneously transmitted to a satellite or control tower or something?

Just thinking out loud.


Cherish those who seek the truth but beware of those who find it. - François-Marie Arouet

Posts: 17909 | Registered: Feb 2011 | From: California
MovingUpward
♂ Guide
Member # 14866
Default  Posted: 8:22 PM, March 9th (Sunday), 2014View ProfileEdit MessagePrivate MessageHomepage

Possible reasons are the following.

Lack of a data collection structure as the data would probably be beamed down to towers and would have to switch as it traveled much like your cell phones.

Another reason that is more plausible is the amount of data that is collected that would need to be transmitted and the number of planes dumping that information.

Another reason is if the communications go down then you have no way to transmit the data where as the black box is tied directly into the plane. it is one degree of separation closer than if you transmit the data.


AKA Moo

Think of the haters in your life as sandpaper; they’ll scratch you up time and time again but in the end you’re polished, smooth, and spotless..while they end up useless

We make a living by what we get, but we make a life by what we give.


Posts: 52766 | Registered: Jun 2007 | From: Big Blue Nation
Jeaniegirl
♀ Member
Member # 6370
Default  Posted: 8:31 PM, March 9th (Sunday), 2014View ProfileEdit MessagePrivate MessageHomepage

Too bad they can't manufacture planes out of the same materials black boxes are made of.


"Because I deserve better"

Posts: 993 | Registered: Feb 2005
LovesLaboursLost
♀ Member
Member # 37272
Default  Posted: 8:52 PM, March 9th (Sunday), 2014View ProfileEdit MessagePrivate MessageHomepage

^^right? If it's supposedly indestructable...


I'm a work in progress.

Posts: 81 | Registered: Oct 2012
Dark Inertia
Member
Member # 30727
Default  Posted: 9:40 PM, March 9th (Sunday), 2014View ProfileEdit MessagePrivate MessageHomepage

I am guessing you are wondering this in light of the Malay flight that disappeared? That whole thing has made me so sick my husband has asked me to stop checking the news about it. Plane crashes always upset me so badly.

[This message edited by Dark Inertia at 9:40 PM, March 9th (Sunday)]


"If I listened earlier, I wouldn't be here. But that's just the trouble with me. I give myself very good advice, but I very seldom follow it."

Posts: 1295 | Registered: Jan 2011 | From: The Ohio
TrustedHer
♂ Member
Member # 23328
Default  Posted: 10:34 PM, March 9th (Sunday), 2014View ProfileEdit MessagePrivate MessageHomepage

Well, this falls into my court, as an IT guy who does VHF and HF radio as a hobby.

The black box records lots and lots of data, including the voices from the cockpit, all the monitoring data from the instruments, settings of controls, airspeed, etc.

Airplanes typically don't use HF radio at all; most of the ATC (Air Traffic Control) conversations happen over VHF, which is short range. There are only a limited number of VHF channels available, and they are all full already, with voice co-ordination of the aircraft movements and status.

Since VHF is short range, it wouldn't do any good to send data over it anyway, for flights going over the ocean or unpopulated areas.

HF has more range. But with that range, you get limitations on data bandwidth; you can send digital data, but it is very low capacity, and error-prone. It's hard enough to send one voice stream, and there's lots of technology in use to get that through.

There's no way to get a huge amount of data through those pipes.

Now that there are satellite links on planes, that's an option. But that's new technology, and actually quite expensive, and it has bandwidth limits too. And outages.

If you've ever used the inflight wifi, you get a sense how limited it is.

I imagine they will move to satellites over time, if it gets cheaper. Just realize that the major airlines have a commercial interest in fitting their planes, and it's taking them years to do their fleets.

As you pointed out, the crashes are rare, and the black boxes are there mainly to determine what happened after the fact. Since the investigations take months and months anyway, they figure they can wait.


Take care of yourself. There's a great future out there. It won't come to you; you have to go to it.

Posts: 5182 | Registered: Mar 2009 | From: DeepInTheHeartOf, TX
Jrazz
♀ Guide
Member # 31349
Default  Posted: 10:39 PM, March 9th (Sunday), 2014View ProfileEdit MessagePrivate MessageHomepage

Cool, thanks everyone! TH, loved the technical breakdown.


Cherish those who seek the truth but beware of those who find it. - François-Marie Arouet

Posts: 17909 | Registered: Feb 2011 | From: California
UnexpectedSong
♀ Member
Member # 21761
Default  Posted: 11:49 PM, March 9th (Sunday), 2014View ProfileEdit MessagePrivate MessageHomepage

Too bad they can't manufacture planes out of the same materials black boxes are made of.

If they did, the plane would be too heavy to fly.


WW(SA)
"Feedback is the breakfast of champions." - Boris Becker

Posts: 6101 | Registered: Nov 2008 | From: California
purplejacket4
♀ Member
Member # 34262
Default  Posted: 11:48 PM, March 10th (Monday), 2014View ProfileEdit MessagePrivate MessageHomepage

T/J trustedher did you see Non Stop? I was just wondering how much of that was plausible. It scared me so bad I'll have to either have a stiff drink or a Xanax for my next flight.


Me: BS 45
Her: fWS 48 (same sex partner)
Together: 18 years now (both MDs)
OW: meh so what 40s PhD
DD1: 10/30/11EA; DD2: 11/10/11 Had ONS; TT until 12/26/11; broke NC 6/12; NC again 7/12; R-ish

Posts: 2262 | Registered: Dec 2011 | From: Great Southwest
Topic Posts: 9

Return to Forum: Off Topic Post Reply to this Topic
adultry
Go to :
madness  
© 2002 - 2014 SurvivingInfidelity.com. All Rights Reserved.