I want to talk a little bit about family backgrounds, which was brought up in a previous thread that I started.
One part of my story that continues to bother me is that when my WW was busy justifying her behavior to me, she brought up the fact that (and I believe she only learned of this very recently) her parents' relationship had begun while her mother was still married to her first husband. The way I understand it is that she had been married for six months, it had been an abusive relationship, and had no money of her own and couldn't afford a divorce. While this situation was very different from ours, my wife's takeaway from it was this. "I know that we're supposed to think that people who have affairs are terrible people," she said. "But do you think my father is a terrible person? Do you think my mother is?" Her mother's spin on the situation was that my WW's father had saved her from a loveless marriage. "I'm not saying that that's exactly what's happening here," my wife explained, "But it's not as black and white as you think it is."
This background is, I am sure, one of the reasons that my mother-in-law did not upbraid my wife as severely as she should have when she learned she was having an affair. She saw our situation through the lens of hers, and the fact that her affair concluded with a 31 year-long largely-successful marriage to another man.
I have many problems with this, starting, of course, with the very substantial ways in which our situation differs from theirs. In addition, I tried to explain to my wife that the issue was not whether she was a terrible person, but that she had done a terrible thing and had made no effort to make it right. My evaluation of her character, from that point on, would have to be based on her response to what she had done. Did she recognize how badly she had hurt me. Would she show remorse, repent, try to make things better? She did none of these things.
But most of all, the thing that bothers me is that her parents did what they did and thought they had gotten away scot free. What was there to regret? The person my mother in law had cheated on was an abusive asshole, and she had 31 years of marriage and two children to look back on as fruits of this decision.
But they are ignoring the biggest consequence in my opinion, that 31 years later, their daughter would use their story to help justify her own infidelity and the unneccesary and cruel demolition of her family, abandoning her husband and breaking up her daughter's home.
And this is what I am worried about going forward. I am worried that what is happening now is going to adversely affect my daughter's attitudes towards divorce on the one hand, and infidelity on the other: that a seed is being planted that might not bear its noxious fruit for decades.
I know that I will do my best to teach my daughter as she grows older to hold higher ideals when it comes to family. But I don't know what the hell my wife is going to teach her. And it's not as if my in-laws actively taught my wife that divorce or infidelity were okay. They didn't have to. They taught it by example. And if my wife and I do manage to live relatively happy and fulfilling lives after this, I worry that, only seeing the end result, she won't understand the horror and pain of what is happening now, nor will she have perspective on how much better it could have been if we had worked things out.
Basically, I am horrified at the prospect that history may repeat itself. What can I do to make this less likely?
[This message edited by dbellanon at 10:44 AM, June 21st (Friday)]