WB,
You didn't grow because of the A. You grew because of the work you did after the A.
*****
Not only did my W find out about my use of SI soon after I started; our MC found out, too. MC checked it out and told me it looked helpful. (As I've said, great MC.) After that, I was wont to say, 'This came up on SI, and I have these thoughts/ feelings/ concerns....' That was very helpful.
I suggested my W join, but she said she wanted me to have a safe space. Two years in, she wanted some support I was unwilling to give, and I directed her to SI. She became a valued member for a while. She said the responses to her first post were 'sort of harsh,' but she persisted.
*****
2.5 years after d-day, I told our MC (in a session) that I was concerned because I didn't trust my W. MC shut me down. Wouldn't even discuss it. 'It's too early,' she said.
I think she meant, 'It's too early for for trust unless you're ready to give it.' I think she'd tell you it's too early for you to think about trust. As I say, she's a great MC, so you ought to believe ...um... my guess about what she'd say to you.
If R is going to work for you, you W will take your feedback, recognize that you're still with her, and continue to do her work.
*****
T0i0F,
Your calculation works only if your assumptions are correct.
I say that as someone who was betrayed 45 years into the relationship.... I sort of understand the Bayesian approach, but I'm an ex-historian, not a mathematician, and I congratulate you on applying it. I don't say your assumptions are bad, only that they may be bad. You are, after all, the 1st (that I know of) to apply the process to infidelity.
fBH (me) - on d-day: 66, Married 43, together 45, same sex apDDay - 12/22/2010Recover'd and R'edYou don't have to like your boundaries. You just have to set and enforce them.