To be defensive, annoyed, or short when discussing their wayward behaviors? Basically—- having an attitude about it.
Ic feels that some level of defensiveness is to be expected and that I should take it as a sign as my failure to communicate rationally.
You already got a chorus of opinions going one way. You don’t need another. So at the risk of getting flamed I’m going to play devil’s advocate and ask a few questions.
Why is your IC saying this? What’s the background? How are you approaching your WS about Wayward behaviors? Can you provide examples of how you try and talk to your WS about the A and how your WS responds back? Are you yelling and screaming and calling names? All of that would be completely understandable, but it’s not conducive to anything constructive.
Ideally, your WS would be there to support you regardless of how you broach the subject. And if you’re emotional, they’d get that and support you too. But, ideally our spouses wouldn’t have cheated on us either, right?
Basically, I do think you need to switch your IC, because even if there’s something there, it’s worded in a very attacking / blame the victim type manner and that’s a big No in my book. But I do think it’s important to ask yourself whether the way you are dealing with your WS is the best way. Again, it’s understandable if you’re not ready for that yet, but it’s good to know.
Having said all of the above, if your WS is not being emotionally supportive and in general has a bad attitude when it comes to discussing his Wayward behavior, that’s a huge red flag in terms of R. I’d be divorced today if my wife was that way.
Me: BH 47
Her: WW 46
DDay 8/3/15
"Every life is a pile of good things and bad things. The good things don’t always soften the bad things, but vice versa the bad things don’t necessarily spoil the good things or make them unimportant.” - The Doctor