Sorry it's long.
We're supposedly doing mediation, at least so far it looks like it, though WW pitched a fit and cancelled the first meeting and will supposedly reschedule for mid-Jan.
Now, from what my lawyer tells me, I have several options that let us both control costs and keep control of the process (or give parts or all the process over to L if I feel it's warranted). Note: I'm in California - no fault, everything 50/50, established child and spousal support formulas. It should be dead simple.
- We can go to mediation by ourselves and not actually sign agreement, just say everything is contingent to lawyer's review but can still actually have the talk and make the tentative decisions. After the mediation meeting, we take the resulting papers for the Ls for redlining, and there's a small back and forth between them on the finer points. May reduce costs, especially if the paralegal can check a lot of it and only bring up possible trouble areas to L. (this is the option I'm going for)
- I can have L show up with to mediation and negotiate for me (the other party should probably do the same). Useful if you think they're going to try to railroad you, although of course now there's 3 lawyers in the room, getting paid hourly. Probably not what you went to mediation for. :-)
- You can mix and match, have L show for only some of the mediation, depending on the topics you want support with. Keeping the other party informed of which parts you'd like representation with lets her also bring hers to those parts. The rest you discuss, tentatively agree, they redline.
(I got an honest lawyer who explained me the cost structure and reasoning clearly so I could make an informed choice - imagine that!)
Now, when my WW went to her L originally, she was asked for a high retainer (1.5x the amount my L asked me - apparently she complained bitterly about me and I'm to be considered "dangerous" - gotta love foggy WSs and their histrionics). I don't know if the L is trying to rip her off or she's planning to try to nail me to the wall (but again, it's CA, so I don't know what would work other than false accusations, which is why I'm out of the house and taking precautions).
But what strikes me as odd is that my WW had never heard of these options for using legal representation during mediation. She got really upset that I paid a retainer for one (I didn't tell her, somehow she found out - seems I need to plug an information hole at the bank or something).
Why would she have a L consult, who supposedly recommended her the mediation in the first place, and not have been told about these mediation representation options, which my own L was clear and up front during the very first free consult?
Because I'm nice, I tried to explain these options to WW. But she's panicky, foggy and is behaving sort of like a teenager at the moment so she doesn't want to listen. I can only hope her L is not a blood sucking vampire, but I'll be ready if she is.
To me it sounds like WW's L is trying to rip WW off but it's her L choice. So be it. At least I won't be paying for hers.
What do you all think?