Hi 20yrs,
It sounds like you have been having some good and productive conversations, and that is great. It can be hard to plan them, because they can go off in so many directions, but having a basic agenda is always good.
“She was broken and in a bad place and took the easy way out by escaping.”
The affair was an ‘escape’ from a ‘bad place’? If I was in your position, I would want clarification of that, because there’s a ton of avoidance in that woolly language, and very little explanation. Did you notice her being ‘different’ in herself in the period before the affair? I think that is relevant to think about that, because if what your wife says is true, then she stopped communicating with you when she perceived problems in the relationship or sank into a depression, and embarked on the affair to – basically – cheer herself up. The questions that begs are:
- Why didn’t she communicate her feelings with you?
- How was an affair improving anything?
- Is your wife suggesting that she was in a broken bad place for a year and a half? If so, then having the affair clearly didn’t cure the blues, and yet it continued it for a long time after that must have been obvious.
- Who and what was she ‘escaping’? You? The marriage?
Personally, I get sense that the affair happened for much more basic, selfish, and obvious reasons (sexual attraction to the OM), but your wife does not want to admit that. The woolliness of the ‘broken’ ‘bad place’ ‘escape’ stuff seems like a smokescreen with nothing of any substance behind it. The whole ‘bad place’ thing, whatever that means, seems designed to garner sympathy, and make the affair seem less like plain old selfish cake-eating (and there are always elements of that in any affair); a simple case of “I had the hots for another guy and I didn’t let being married stop me”.
The reason I mention this is because laying a false veneer of ‘bad places’ over a simple, basic decision to cheat, means that the mechanics of deciding to cheat are not being worked on, or even admitted to. In a way, it is allowing the deceit of the affair to continue in the communications between you. A year and a half is a very long time to be ‘down’ and in a state of ‘escape’, which is why it does not ring true to me as a motivation for the affair.
However, for whatever reason the affair began, your wife had no problem maintaining a relationship with another man for a year and a half. That capacity or ability raises questions about her general attitude to the truth, her understanding of what marriage is supposed to be, and why deceit and betrayal are amongst her coping mechanisms in relationships. Those are issues where counselling could really help, and why you, and several of us here, hoped counselling would be a part of her healing.
“After D-day and much reading and self reflection she feels she is in a different place. She knows what she should have done differently and would do that now. She would seek help from friends, family, talk through her issues not run from them. She does not want to dwell on the past but understands that there is still a need for me to understand things and heal.”
That is good stuff, and it is exactly the work that counselling can really help with, but your wife is only seeing half the picture if she thinks that you are the only one who needs to heal in the aftermath of the affair. Yes, of course you are healing from the bomb that she dropped on you, and what the affair revealed about her, but it is equally important in the aftermath of an affair that a wayward spouse is ‘healed’ or ‘fixed’ so that the mechanism that allowed them to cheat is neutralised and disabled.
There is a significant contradiction between your wife’s words and actions in relation to being more open in future and discussing her problems with other people, because she has actively avoided counselling, and still is. This is not something to ignore, because if she is not willing to talk to a neutral third party NOW about how she enabled herself to have the affair, is she really going to tell her friends or her Mom that she wants to have sex with someone at work if the urge every returns in future?
The perception that she does not need counselling after a year and a half long affair indicates that your wife does not see anything in herself that needs fixing, which is also significant. Effectively, she is saying that as she is now in a ‘better place’, and does not feel like having sex with anyone else at the moment, everything is fine, and there is nothing to fix. That misses the point by a mile, because it assumes that the capacity to deceive for a year and a half does not need fixing. In fact, it is in both your best interests that that aspect of your wife’s behaviour is addressed and improved, because she needs to default to honesty in future, with you, and also the friends she says she will communicate with more openly.
Maybe the approach you can take to this is that what she is doing is great, but that counselling (with a better counsellor, who actually knows about infidelity) will be a positive boost for the efforts your wife is making. If she is still resistant, you could ask, “But what would it hurt to try it?” It is hard to see counselling doing anything negative, isn’t it? And if your wife is committed to being open and talking – as she says she is – this is a way to both practice and prove it, isn’t it? Another approach you could take if she sees no point to it is, “Would you do it for me?” Obviously, it is better if she goes into it with a genuine desire to change, but she may still make progress even if she thinks there is nothing that needs changing when the course of counselling begins. However, as I say, I think it would need to be with a better counsellor than the last one.
“A few things I read in NJF that helped me was the idea of training your mind to think about the pain or worry at a set time and to park those thoughts other times.”
That’s a really interesting idea. I am going to try that ‘scheduled thinking’ approach and see if I can make it work.
“Also to start to document your questions and bring them up when you are both in a good frame of mind. I am thinking for us it would be valuable to have an appointed time to discuss questions, the reading and other items. It would help have an ongoing dialogue about my concerns with IC, job location and other questions about the past.”
IC for you is good, I am sure everyone could benefit from it, but I think that perhaps these discussions would be better placed in MC sessions, with a good counsellor who has experience with infidelity. The reason I say that is that your wife is still resistant to having IC herself, and if she simply won’t do that, or goes into it with an uncooperative approach, it might not do much good. Also, you will have no idea what has been discussed in your wife’s IC sessions. If you can get her to go to MC with you – again, try the “Will you do this for me?” approach – both of you will be getting counselling, and you can make a list of all the things you want discussed, with the counsellor as a mediator. That way, you can be sure that your concerns are at least getting an airing, and a good counsellor will know how to get your wife to open up, and how to get round any smokescreens she may try to create.
“She shared again that when they were away together for 5 days she had a 'breakdown' once the conference ended and they were vacationing. She was overcome with guilt and they 'broke up'. My question was why 2 weeks later did you go back to him? This is actually my question through out the affair period. If you felt sick, guilty, awful why did you continue? She said she felt trapped and she felt sorry for him. The AP had so many plans for them and she knew deep down that those things would never happen. This was an escape for her that she says she had become trapped in.”
Again, the ‘escape’ element needs to be clarified, and also the ‘trap’ issue. I have to be honest, I do not really buy that. She may have felt some guilt about leading the guy on, and letting him think they had a future together, but feeling ‘sorry’ for a man is a total turn-off for women when it comes to sexual relationships, and it would have ended the affair very quickly if she felt any pity for him. ‘Pity’ and ‘sorry’ ain’t sexy. Pity and sorry do not sustain an active physical and emotional relationship for a year and a half. That is simply bullshit, and your wife is trying to portray herself as the poor victim of the affair she started and maintained for a long time. She was trapped into having sex with this guy repeatedly, for a whole year? Come off it. It was done because she enjoyed doing it, and she went back again because she had a hard time ending it.
The interesting thing that has been revealed is that while your wife was actively deceiving you at home, she was also actively deceiving the OM during the affair by letting him think that they had some kind of future together. Effectively, she was cheating on both you and the OM, deceiving both of you simultaneously because it suited her to do that. You were being deceived and minding the kids at home, and the OM was the person in a ‘trap’, thinking the affair was going somewhere when he was just being used. That your wife wishes to paint herself as the victim in this scenario is either delusion (if she genuinely believes it), or a blatant attempt to re-write history and avoid responsibility for her actions in deceiving both of you at once. Is it any wonder she does not want to examine or explain her actions in any depth in counselling, and desires instead to leave it all behind quickly without delving into it? However, it is entirely your call about what you want examined and fixed, and whether or not you are happy to go along with that.
“To me there are so many questions and wouldn't that be the thing to explore in IC. From her end she says she is so confident of what she wants. It’s the family, it’s the marriage. She has no doubt and no concern with no contact.”
You are exactly right. There is an awful lot that needs to be properly addressed in counselling, regardless of what your wife says about her aims for the future. The counselling is about figuring out how she enabled the affair, and her capacity for deceit and dishonesty, not affirming her plans for the future. Again, this is an attempt to dodge the problems, not address them.
No doubt and no concern with no contact, after breaking it several times, knowing the OM’s vacation plans, and continuing to work with him every day? On this one, you have ample evidence that the concept of NC has been deliberately misinterpreted, and that its breaking has been lied about repeatedly. The very first post in this thread was about this exact thing, and the troubling “I will contact you later” message that your wife sent the OM. What is apparent is that they are perfectly comfortable with one another, and that your wife does not see the OM as a bad guy. Does your wife really have any credibility on the subject anymore?
“I told her I had written down my goals and she asked what they were. I shared them with her and the next day she said she was inspired to do the same. Her first goal was to be more present in the marriage and to embrace life long love and commitment.”
As with so many statements made about the affair, those are nice words, but only time will tell if there is any real meaning to them. I hope that there is, for both your sakes, but you really need to take everything your wife says with a pinch of salt until her actions provide proof. And if there are things that you need her to do for your peace of mind, like enter counselling and leave that job, then you really must stick to your guns and insist they get done. And I think that MC would be a good idea, so that you can raise your issues with a neutral mediator present to control things and ensure that your questions get a full and proper response. I am not convinced that your wife will open up or be honest in IC, but in MC, you are there too, not relying on your wife’s word about what went on at the session, and what the conclusions were.
As a general counter-statement to any resistance you encounter about things you want your wife to do, “I need you to do this for me” is a hard one to wriggle out of. Do not get drawn into justifying it, nor explaining it, keep reverting to “I need you to do this for me.”