SurvivingInfidelity.com^®

I was reading this morning an article written by a well known ultra marathon runner and author on why she got and later removed her implants and what she had to go through. An interesting and well written article. What caught my attention is her reasons for getting them at age 34. Seems she was rebuilding her marriage "I had fallen prey to another man’s flattery that plugged into my need for attention validation yada yada as a stay at home mom."

A couple of things.

22 years later she is still blaming someone else.

There was no reason in the article for this info to be highlighted. It was gratuitous. I’m thinking Hey dumbass. Show a little empathy. Your BH deserves some privacy. Maybe his entire family and yours, his friends and work colleagues and everyone in his social circle already knows he is a cuckold. Was it necessary to broadcast this to another million strangers? And just to make sure you put up pictures so everyone knows it’s you?

This is a big thing for guys. You would prefer to keep this private as it is nobody’s business and no matter what anyone says it is a stigma.

I wanted to shake this woman. Sigh. Some people just don’t get it. Some people never get it.

Longsadstory,

The author is a BS not a cheater.

This is what I found on Google AI.

Infidelity and Reconciliation: In 2011, Smith shared that her marriage faced a crisis when she discovered her husband was having an affair with his running partner. The couple used therapy and their shared love of running as a metaphor for their relationship, ultimately saving their marriage and staying together for over 40 years.

Sarah Lavender Smith is the author.

[This message edited by Dorothy123 at 12:10 AM, Saturday, January 10th]

If you do the math it would have been 2003 when she had her A. She explicitly says she hurt him.

Anyway, looks like quite a pair of mad hatters.

Wrong again

I googled did Sarah Lavender Smith cheat on her husband.

This was AI's response

There is no public evidence or credible reports to suggest that Sarah Lavender Smith cheated on her husband.
She is a well-known writer and ultrarunner who often shares personal stories about her life, health, and athletic journey through her Sarah Lavender Smith Substack. While she has written about personal topics such as facing health challenges and maintaining relationships while pursuing intense athletic goals, there are no mentions of infidelity.
In a February 2025 post, she humorously referred to "cheating" only in the context of her Dry January resolution, where she admitted to having a few drinks with family and friends.

longsadstory1952

Some people have little or no boundaries and/or sense of discretion - and add in lack of empathy - consideration for others.

Gratuitous? Ya, and generally something I would expect to see on "The View" or some other morning TV tabloid.

Regarding AI -

It is like looking for an Easter egg under rocks.

Problem is - AI can't look under all the rocks because "AI" only knows what programmers and data-entry folks have keyed into it's memory.

So? How many programmers have identify all the "rocks" in the world?

Answer? ZERO

AI has it's uses - in this case I call it a "nothing found but not a definite" of event never happened.

* Dorothy dies from embarrassment *

Yet Dorothy is not done with Google AI.

Did someone mention easter eggs?

Taylor Swift is renowned for embedding cryptic clues, symbols, and hidden messages, known as "Easter eggs," throughout her music, lyrics, music videos, and public appearances to tease upcoming projects and share details about her life. This practice has become a signature part of her artistry, creating an interactive experience that encourages her devoted fanbase, known as Swifties, to act as detectives and decode her next moves. The clues range from subtle lyrical references and numerology to overt visual symbols in her videos.

[This message edited by Dorothy123 at 12:53 AM, Saturday, January 10th]

Everyone - I was not intending any slight to Dorothy123 or anyone who is trusting "AI" with 100% truth and correct - whatever.

Now that computers have been developed that can perform astoundingly, AI is becoming useful.

However, it can never replace the human mind emotionally. Also, think of the mind and skill of a painter. (Rembrandt? Salvador Dali?)

AI capable of that? Nah.

Just don't put 100% trust blindly.

No ruffled feathers here.

I just had a good laugh.