I have not read the book, but have read reviews of it.
It seems to describe a throw-back-to-the-50's kind of W who primps and makes herself look 'pretty' all the time (wears dresses/hair done/make-up), dotes on her H, anticipating his every need, cooking/feeding/cleaning/caring for the children, with constant attention to his comfort, wants, needs including being ready for sex whenever he is.
(Correct me if I have misinterpreted the book...cause I may have.)
My question to the men out there who feel this describes an ideal W:
While you were dating your W, did she indicate that this is the kind of W she would be?
For those who lived with their W's before getting M'd, is this how she conducted herself while living together?
I guess my point is this: I imagine that most men, while dating and pre-M, were with women who were NOT cut from this throw-back-to-the-50's mold. So...did you expect them to change after M into this version of dream W?
I am just considering myself here and my situation. I never wore dresses for the 6 years we dated, yet, THAT was exactly a HUGE complaint my WH aired during MC...that I "never wear dresses." So, I guess that was 'my bad'...or so the book would have me think. But, the way I see it is that my WH KNEW exactly the 'kind' of W I would be...not the dress-wearin' kind...and he M'd me anyway.
HE asked me to marry him.
So...what gives?
'Who' I was while dating...is the same person my WH M'd...and is still, for the most part, 'who' I am today.
WHY would any woman be expected to CHANGE into this 50's woman? It would be such a personal overhaul that, in the forced change, she would certainly lose herself...who she really is.
No thanks.