I've said this before but the older I get, the more I mean it. If I was of child bearing age today, there's no way I'd have them. I worry about my youngest in ways I never worried about my oldest. The world she'll be going out into in a couple years just terrifies me.
I've felt that way for a long time (and no kids because of it). Kids born today (and some of us too, depending on your age) are going to see absolutely tectonic shifts in the world over their lifetime. Yes, there have been others, in fact, people alive this today have seen more change than anyone who died 5 years ago (the pace of change keeps accelerating), but what's happened so far is table stakes compared to what's coming. In 50 years, we may be living in a near utopia or we may be living in something out of a dystopian novel. We're on the "cusp" with several technologies with will completely alter the way the world works, self driving automobiles will make the world massively safer (good thing) but will also put about 10% of the world out of work, many forever. Artificial intelligence continues to climb the ladder, and, eventually, there's an inflection point where it starts to approach human level "G" (general intelligence) and can do many/most of the jobs we do today. We have no idea how to program creativity, so, those jobs are safe for the foreseeable future, but, only a tiny faction of jobs require that skill and, that skill isn't at all distributed evenly. Imagine if the "job requirement" in the future was to be 6'9" tall, you'll get an idea of the problem, very few people are that tall, and if you're not that tall, well... Too bad.
Perhaps we'll use this technology to give us all more free time, more resources (for all of us) and more self-actualization. I have my doubts though, ever technological advance we've ever had has lead in the other other direction, more work for those who have the skills and more concentration of wealth/power to those who control (or work on) the technology. Every projection that's espoused the "20 hour work week" or "more leisure time" has been wrong. Maybe, eventually, it won't be anymore and we'll move from a species of scarcity to one of abundance. I hope so, and I hope I'm here to see that, but, I have my doubts.
One of the ones that I think about a lot (well, because this is a site about affairs) is what does the future of male/female interaction look like? At some point, we're going to release a technology that's markedly "better than sex" for men. Porn on steroids, something that's so sexually appealing that "real sex" loses some of/all of its appeal. This could be utopia for both sexes, if a guy is pursuing you, it's obviously not for sex because, well.. Machines do that much better. But it could also be, and I think is more likely to be, far more destructive than it is helpful. There's a reason prostitution has been illegal for so long and it has little to do with protecting women and much more to do with protecting society. Allowing men to directly exchange money for "great" sexual experiences tears at the fabric of our social construct, but, as machines improve, eventually things are going to wind up this way, just with prostitutes replaced by "Cherry 2000". Will it be great for everyone, no more women forced into prostitution, no more wives having duty sex, no more men starving for affection? It could be, but, I doubt it.