Kudulies
There are positives and negatives in your story.
What is positive is that he is offering more info than you had already confirmed. It shows a will for atonement.
Hang around here long enough and you will realize that the main killer of marriages isn’t necessarily the infidelity itself, but rather the constant chipping away at any hope or wish to reconcile that trickle-truth and new discoveries leads to. His forthrightness is positive. It helps give you a base to decide if you want to put in the effort to reconcile or if you are better off divorcing.
This positive is immense. IMHO it’s the base on whether there is any future at all for this marriage.
The negatives?
Well… I find parts of his story hard to believe.
Maybe I’m old-fashioned, but I have never even contemplated taking a picture of my dick and sending it to some woman in the hope it makes them want anal-sex in the garage. In fact – sending an unsolicited picture of a sexual nature is basically a crime in many/most states and a firing offence in many/most companies. I would THINK that by the time he feels safe enough to send him a dickpick there has been more than enough sexually-related communications to make him feel secure in sending the pics. Same the other way around. The woman isn’t sharing her pics without prompting or some affirmation or expectation that they not be spread on the office gossip forum. There is more build-up there than he’s letting in on.
Then the go-to-the-garage-for-anal-sex issue…
Back in the days when I was single I had to – as a minimum – buy a drink or two before getting some sex. Usually a dinner and maybe a couple of dates… Once again – maybe old-fashioned – but to go directly to anal-sex in the garage… No… Maybe anal was part of the act but I’m thinking your husband is misguided in thinking non-vaginal sex is “less” of a crime. It isn’t… what is “less” of a crime is the TRUTH.
I might be totally off on the above. Maybe the OW had her period or was into anal-sex. But to ME it smells funky (pun intended).
I THINK there is still some truth missing. Major relevant proof. In your shoes I would want more assurance that you know the truth.
Another negative is the work-related affairs.
In today’s work-environment HR and management HEAVILY frown on sexual misconduct. I don’t know your husbands work environment or his job-level, but I’m a manager and I KNOW that any personal/romantic/sexual connection with any co-worker and/or customer must be reported. I have had to talk to men about inappropriate actions, jokes, words and texts in the work-place. I have seen careers derailed because of inappropriate actions. It’s seldom as direct as a clear firing for sexual misconduct. It’s more often being passed over for bonuses, raises, promotions or a relocation to a dead-end job.
Keep in mind that if your H is like most other womanizers then it’s not that he finds ONE woman and get’s a reaction. He’s hitting out at anything wearing a skirt, sending messages and signals. Like a good hunter he then focuses on where he get’s nibbles. But honey – chances are the women at the office see your husband as one of those guys you don’t want to be alone in the elevator with.
He needs to understand how creepy his behavior is and how it threatens – amongst other things – the families income possibilities. He needs to realize the small but still present risk of being branded a sexual offender if he sends unsolicited sexual content. IMHO the sexual-offender list is overused: I personally would be OK living next door to someone charged with public urination and hate that they are marked in a comparable way as a flasher at a playground, but your husband is taking the risk of being included on such a list…
I think you are correct that the affairs had nothing to do with sex. I think ALL affairs are about power and domination and validation. Be it a man or a woman. Sex is simply the median, the forbidden reward or pay-off to establish you have this dominance and power and are validated. I think IC is the best tool for him to get to why he feels this entitled that he can have an affair.
One final thought:
IF you decide to reconcile and carry on with this marriage then DO NOT fall into the trap that the solution is simply that he no longer cheats.
Give yourself time to think seriously what you want out of a marriage. A good point to ponder is to look at him and remember that if he had a life-threatening accident and was in a coma the doctors would ask YOU if they should keep him alive on life-support. What would your decision be based on? Duty? Love? Financial reasons? Relief of getting rid of him?
Then turn the roles around and imagine YOU were in a coma. Why would HE keep you alive?
Personally, I hope that in the above scenario my decision (and my wife’s) would be based on LOVE and RESPECT – irrespective of if they hit the on or off switch.
IF you decide to stay in this marriage then make sure he commits to the work to realize and work out why he cheats. But also commit to the work of improving your communications, setting joint goals and working at being a better couple.
But be clear on this: That work is in no way connected to the affair. He did not cheat because of marital issues.