He says his insides are rearranged and nothing will let him return to betraying himself again and that means betraying me.
My heart gives him the side eye.
Hi Mickie,
Your heart is right to do that. 8 months out your husband has not rearranged everything. Change and growth take time. He may not be at risk for cheating, but there is a lot that goes into WS work that goes beyond that.
At 9 months in my husband was probably where you are, he asked me for a divorce. We went through IHS, drew up the papers. I think where you are is not uncommon at all. I can tell from the other post that I am working with you on that your insides are in a complete state of chaos and pain. I am not sure that's where the decision should come from.
I tell BS's all the time they don't have to put pressure on themselves to choose, there is no expiration date for deciding to change course. If my husband still wanted a divorce at this point, I would be devastated but I would understand that I am the one who broke the marriage. So, there is no pressure to choose, I think focus on healing you right now and then when you make the decision you will be more comfortable with whatever it is you choose.
Stop guilting yourself and putting undue pressure on yourself. The “reconciliation isn’t for everyone” bromide that gets thrown around here pretty casually is frankly a subtle form of blameshifting.
It is interesting that is your perspective of those words, Thumos. When I read "reconciliation isn't for everyone" I often think "because your WS is not remorseful" or "because your WS's transgressions are above and beyond a baseline and too much for one person to process" or "because your values and internal life will not allow it". That third one is not a slam, that is a condition that was still caused by the WS. I think maybe you read it that way because of your POV/experience. Just wanted to challenge you on that thinking a bit because I do not think that's typically what the poster is saying, more a shorthand that is often used on the site.
The “maybe it’s a dealbreaker for you” catchphrase around here also subtly implies that if infidelity is a dealbreaker for you, you’re somehow a hard hearted person. I disagree.
Again, I see that the same way - really not just "for you" but "for your situation". I think it's an interesting topic as to how people read that though, it falls in line with the other topic about language right now. I think if you feel this way others might as well and we may need to consider our shorthand. I know I am guilty of saying "R may not be for you" but I say it as often to a WS as I do a BS. I only say it to a WS if they have an unhealthy/abusive BS. If I think it's the WS's issue I state directly what makes the issue unhealthy.
[This message edited by hikingout at 9:15 AM, August 12th (Wednesday)]