Hi Anon,
I have a big problem with measured response. I will go from nicely denying a patient pain medication to screaming at them loud enough for the whole hospital to hear. I often avoid conflict so that I’ll avoid losing my temper.
I have had to learn to take action or speak up as soon as something bothers me, because for years I would let things slide and say nothing until things built up and I felt like I was pushed to the extreme end of my tolerance. At which point I would blow up and lose it. This was not good for anyone, but it took me a while to figure out what I was doing, why I was doing it, and how I take action earlier, in a less extreme way, to prevent problems from escalating. And that is the thing; if you catch things early, you often don’t have to have a big conflict about them.
There is a huge amount of material online about conflict resolution, and how to be assertive in a positive way. We had a few little workshops on the subject at work, and I tried some of the simple little techniques, and they worked. What I found was that it is hardly ever a case of a person being ‘spineless’; it is more likely that they have not had good examples in their life of how to intervene positively and speak up for themselves in the ‘right’ way, so they have nothing to learn from. Believe me, you can be very assertive without ever having to shout or be aggressive. That is where a lot of people get confused, and feel that if they are assertive, they are being aggressive, or even a bully.
One very simple technique is to just explain the impact of somebody’s actions on you. It really is as basic as saying to someone, “When you do X, I feel Y”. If you have thought about the situation before the discussion – and who won’t have done that? – you may have some alternative options that you can suggest. Thus, you expand on the theme: “When you do X, I feel Y. I think it would be better if we do Z in future”. Or, “When you do X, I feel Y. Please will you stop it?” Focus on the behaviours or actions, not the person. That helps to prevent anger from entering the discussion.
What struck me when this technique was played out in a workshop was how obvious it was, but how crazy it was that I never dealt with problems in such an open, honest way. If someone annoyed or upset me, the last thing I wanted to do was open up about it, but not being open about my feelings meant that after a while I became a pressure cooker, heading for an inevitable blow up. So I could never give a measured response, because by the time I finally did speak up, there was way too much pressure behind it.
I really think that going on an assertiveness course would help you to learn how to express your feelings, or misgivings, early on in the development of problems, thereby preventing them from escalating to the point where you suddenly snap, and a blow-up occurs. This is in no way a criticism of you. I did not have great examples of calm, neutral problem-solving in my life to learn from, and I am still learning how to do it now, at the age of 52. It is a very common problem for lots of people, which is why there are so many books and courses about the subject. Seriously, what have you go to lose by signing up for an assertiveness course, learning some techniques, doing a bit of role-playing to get used to using the techniques face-to-face with people, etc?
I think something like that is essential if you are going to try and co-habit with your wife rather than going your separate ways, because it is clear that letting her do what she wants has been disastrous for both of you. Your wife lacks direction, and she does not make good decisions. Do you think that what she needs is someone to put her on the right track and keep her there, because when she is left to steer her own way in life, she will end up in another train wreck like the present one?
What I am wondering is whether you are achieving anything positive by withdrawing, but remaining in the marriage and the household. I am not referring to any of the practical or logistical factors like money, the kids, etc, but rather to your mind-set, and how you are positioning yourself in relation to your wife. In effect, you are not making a break and ending the relationship (divorce), but by withdrawing, it is like you are not staying in the marriage in a meaningful way either. I totally understand why staying for the kids may be a factor, and I also understand why you would want to disengage from your wife and implement the 180. Where I see the potential for problems to arise is that your wife is not the kind of person who you can disengage from with any confidence that she will not start working on the next great self-made disaster that she will then claim to be a victim of. If you are going to remain in proximity to her, physically and emotionally, you have no option but to take a more proactive role in ‘fixing’ her.
By all means, implement parts of the 180 to limit the control and influence that your wife has over your emotions, and the level of any emotional dependence on her that you may have. However, at the same time as you do that, you need to increase your involvement in breaking down and neutralising the mechanisms she has established that have enabled her to become her own worst enemy, and to drive the marriage, the family, and herself to the verge of destruction.
To put it bluntly, without a more rational, logical, and sensible person taking an active role in her life, and setting firm boundaries for her own good, she is likely to continue making bad decisions and ruining the quality of life for herself and everyone close to her. These trips to Australia and New Zealand are a case in point. They have given you a solid justification for washing your hands of her, thereby limiting her potential for causing further damage to your life, but what possible benefits did these costly misadventures bring to your wife? She seems to be caught in a very negative cycle. It appears that she does nothing to help herself, and she makes one bad decision after another, until the situation she has created is so bad that she has to run away from it by forming pointless relationships with men who do not care about her, thereby damaging her relationship with a man who does genuinely care for her, which makes her life even worse than it was before.
That is why I think that if you are going to remain in the marriage and in proximity to her, you need to actively intervene to break the cycle that your wife is stuck in, and to pull apart and disable the constituent parts of it that have made it such an engine of destruction. Staying, but not intervening, is not going to break that cycle. It will only lead to further problems. That is why I suggested learning how to become more assertive, because that skill will help to change the dynamic between you and your wife, and it will enable you to have more influence in the direction of all of your lives, which can only be positive and beneficial for you, your wife, and your kids. You are an intelligent and compassionate man, and with more confidence and some fresh techniques and approaches, you can have a very positive impact on the situation. And it could be argued that if you are going to stay together within the marriage, then there needs to be some purpose to your choice to do that.
Staying, but in a withdrawn, disengaged, and non-interventionist role is not going to improve anything, and is basically a waste of your time. All you will be doing is biding your time until the next disaster. Your wife clearly does not understand how to avert that, does she? That is why it needs somebody else to take the reins and set the agenda. You have had a wealth of good advice in this thread about steps that you can take to improve things, and I must add my voice to the chorus that is endorsing the solid and sensible suggestions that stevesn recently provided. There has to be a change to the dynamic that allowed this situation to reach the point that it has.
There may be some resistance or histrionics from your wife, maybe some attempts at manipulation, but in light of the disaster she has created for herself and everyone around her, she does not have a leg to stand on. This is a moment for saying metaphorically, and maybe literally, “Do you want things to get better, or do you want to continue f*cking things up until absolutely everything is destroyed? If you want them to get better, you need to start listening to me.” That is the approach that you need to absorb and have confidence in as you move forward. Of course, that means you need to have something to say, but Stevesn has provided you with an excellent template for improvement, so you have a ready-made plan already available to you. If the approach that you have taken so far has not been successful, why not try a fresh one?
As far as the things she has said about the trip overseas go, I think that you should treat everything with healthy scepticism, which should only change when her actions prove that she has remorse and sees how damaging, immoral, and counter-productive her infidelity has been. And that will take time. There are elements of what she said that do not really stand up to close scrutiny.
Apologized many times and *seemed* to mean it.
It is hard to believe that there is any real heart behind such apologies, because you made it crystal clear on the trip to the airport that you knew that she had organised the trip to cheat with at least one other man, and she still went. So how much did she care about your feelings at the point where it was an exciting adventure that had yet to happen? Not very much, and not enough to cancel the trip. Now that she has had her grand adventure, and she is faced with the reality of settling back into the life and the marriage that she briefly abandoned, suddenly she is full of apologies for a set of actions that she took in full knowledge of the pain they would cause you. For me, that has all the sincerity of punching someone in the face several times and then apologising. If you know it is wrong to do it, don’t do it and apologise; just don’t do it. And a fully grown married mother knows full well that abandoning her family to blatantly go and cheat with another woman’s husband is nothing but 100% wrong. And yet she still did it. So what sudden insight into the wrongness of her actions after she has cheated did she not have before she went on the trip?
Told me it was all her fault and did not blame me. It started because she felt hopeless in life and that she was nothing. She has achieved nothing and feels inferior to me in intelligence and social stature. Kids don’t make her feel accomplished and she acknowledged it was stupid but she couldn’t help he way she felt.
Those are good reasons to talk to her husband and get into counselling. What part of flying around the world to have sex with another woman’s husband was supposed to improve any of those problems? Does transcontinental infidelity count as an achievement? The feelings that she describes may be genuine, but they are totally and utterly unrelated to her decision to start cheating. She is trying to make a connection to justify something that is unjustifiable, and I think you should make it quite clear that cheating was in no way, shape, or form a natural product of the feelings she describes, because – as I have said – there is no part of having a tawdry affair that was going to improve them.
Now the parts of her story I doubt. WW told me they could not have intercourse because he had erectile dysfunction. Admitted to groping, heavy petting, kissing, etc. This *might* be true because the sexting messages... how shall I say? He seemed clinically disappointing. Also, I hadn’t figured out why she texted him that she had bought him a vibrator/dildo.
Perhaps ED is a major problem, but there seems to be remarkable number of stories in these forums where wayward wives claim their affair partners could not get an erection. Which rather begs the question of why a man with such a problem worked so hard to get another man’s wife to fly halfway around the world to witness the spectacle of his flaccid, floppy member, or why she would make all that effort for the privilege. Why would a man with performance issues go to all that time and trouble to demonstrate his inability to have sex? And this also seems to ignore the potential for Viagra to be used. And in a way, it is almost irrelevant, because your wife flew out there hoping that he would be able to have sex with her, and she was fully willing to do that. Is there really any virtue in intercourse not happening in those circumstances?
She also told me that she called him while away during this trip and said she could never see him again. She said she did not meet him this trip. I find that nearly unbelievable, am I to believe she went to Sydney by herself? Our friend said she didn’t want her to come along while WW said she invited our friend. Hmmm...
I think you should treat that for what it appears to be, which is bullsh*t. The fact that her friend says your WW did not want her to go along sounds more convincing, because the friend has nothing to gain through saying that if it is a lie, does she? Whereas, your wife does have plenty to gain by claiming the friend was with her, thereby justifying the trip, and also making it appear that meeting another man for sex would have been awkward. It doesn’t take Sherlock Holmes to figure that out!
She agreed to write a no contact letter (and have no contact) and would give me a timeline. She is going to IC on Tuesday and will schedule marriage counselling. She also agreed to start looking for a job and will get a primary care doctor and STD testing. I told her that I had informed her family she had expressed suicidal ideation and was traveling secretly to NZ.
That is good stuff for the immediate future, but please, Anon, use the list that stevesn has provided for you. Much more needs to be done to get this show back on the rails.
I didn’t tell her I had implied what she was really doing but never told them outright.
Anon, why imply? Why hint? Why be coy? Just tell these people exactly what you are having to deal with. It may spur them into doing something to support you, and it will make it harder for your wife to lie to them in future. Seriously, where is the harm in telling them, in plain English, what has happened? You have nothing to be ashamed of.
I felt the urge to have sex with her (not sure why) and I think she would have. I resisted, not sure when the right time for this would be, but I didn’t want to cloud my judgement (more than it already is).
They call it ‘hysterical bonding’, and there are many psychological reasons for it. Resisting and keeping a clear head certainly cannot hurt.
I hope that what has been said in this thread will continue to sink in, Anon, because everyone here is rooting for you, and their suggestions are made with the best intentions, and in hopes that your situation can be changed for the better.
[This message edited by M1965 at 4:14 PM, March 19th (Monday)]