No direct offense, but your not really changing what you basically said and that was what I was addressing was this statement:
No, I’m not changing what I said, I’m trying to clarify it.
I pretty sure you didn't mean it to be challenging or offensive, but sorry some of us took it that way.
No, I didn’t. I meant it as a statement of my personal opinion.
That's call generalization and in some cases transference.
Generalization is the proper way to make general statements. In fact, I know of no other way to do that.
It's like someone who says "Hey everyone steals under the right circumstances and if you say you don't your a liar."
No, it’s not. Particularly the “If you say you don’t you’re a liar” part. I neither said nor implied any such thing. You read that into it yourself. Why?
Now you are really entitled to your own opinion, and I have no problem with that, but I was saying don't lump me (and some others) into that opinion.
You, and everyone else on the planet, are automatically lumped into an opinion that includes everyone. No way around that. Why are you taking the most generalized statement possible so very personally?
For example you know how hard it was going 22 years as a virgin when everyone around me was having sex and bragging about how 'great' it was?
In fact, I do. I lost my virginity at 24.
Not to mention how submerged the world of TV, movies, and advertising makes it seem if your not sleeping with someone there is something wrong with you.
Ditto.
I loved it when everyone first starting saying that everyone was having sex and when I said "I'm not" they first laughed at me and said I was lying because everyone was doing it. I challenged them to name one person I was doing it with in high school. Then they laughed at me as one of the few virgins in school.
Ditto.
Then I asked one question, why would I be honest enough to sit and tell them that I wasn't having sex in high school, subject myself to all their insults and pranks, if I didn't deeply believe it in?
Ditto.
It was the same in college. Everyone was sleeping with everyone. Thankfully I lived close enough I could drive to the campus so I didn't have to stay in dorms, but the pressure to sleep around was even greater then than at any time. I mean "EVERYONE" was doing it.
Everyone? That’s precisely the same generalization you are taking issue with me about.
So when you insist on claiming that "everyone" as you said in your original post would do it given the right circumstances, to me that says that everything I went through, every slight, insult, ribbing, joke, or ordeal in my life that I believed in and backed was a lie because you're saying that I've just not met that one temptation I can't resist yet, and I call bull, because resisting this daily is who I am.
Again, you’re changing the words I wrote, which alters the meaning. Why?
What I wrote, exactly, was this:
I believe that everyone has the potential to cheat, under the right (or wrong) circumstances. (In fact, I think that people who say they would never cheat may be in greater danger of doing so, because they may not erect boundaries against it, since they don't think it's a danger.)
That carries a very different meaning than the one you are assigning it. The word potential being key. If, as I believe, everyone has the potential to cheat, given the right circumstances, then it follows that the only people who won’t cheat under any circumstances are those who aware of their own potential and prepare for it. Meaning that even those who will not cheat have the potential.
The ability to cheat is not in me and I embrace that, and regardless of what you say I will never do it, and if you don't believe me you are free to do so, but then I'll have to start to wonder about transference again .....
Then we will simply have to disagree. However, my post was not about you any more than it was about everyone on Earth, myself included, as I am also covered by the word “everyone”, so transference is a non-starter. Perhaps you should wonder instead why you are taking such personal affront to a general opinion?
I have a 2nd Degree brown belt in Tae Kwon Do. I boxed for a number of years. I also practiced Shao Lin (form of Kung Fu) as well as Judo.
The similarities between us are startling: I have a black belt in Kenpo, boxed for a number of years, studied escrima and (briefly) Han-bai kung-fu. I am larger than average, and having lifted weights for 26 years am stronger than average. None of this makes me invincible, puncture or bullet-proof.
If I can't disarm or stop someone without resorting to "stabbing" them then I'm already screwed.
No, you're screwed if you can't disarm or stop someone without stabbing them, and can't or won't stab them.
I have attended the funeral of a black belt who thought he could disarm a mugger who was armed with a knife. I’ve seen a number of black belts lose bar fights against “untrained” street fighters, and I’ve seen so many martial artist made absolute fools of while sparring with boxers that I will bet on the boxer or the street fighter every single time.
If someone is threatening the life of someone I love, and I have access to a weapon, I’ll use it. My job is to protect them by any means possible, not to show them how well trained and tough I am.
I've been in more fights growing up that one should in my neighorhood, and later as while I was doing martial arts than you can imagine. I was ranked third in the tri-state area. I've been jumped, teamed up on, and backed in a corner in fights. Yet I've never resorted to doing "anything" to win.
I've even taken the short end of a beating because I couldn't make myself do lasting damage to someone even in anger.
So to answer you question "No I have been in those situations before and I "STILL" have not resorted to doing whatever it takes to win." The one time I hit someone in anger in 6th grade I still have guilt over. I was so much stronger than other kids at my age and that fear is still with me because a single punch gave him such a black eye that it was swollen closed with in the hour and that fight was right before school started and I had to look at his face during the day and on the way home. I'm 41 and I still feel guilty over that even now.
It's who I am. Period. I learned martial arts to learn to control the situation and "not" do lasting damage to anyone for any reason.
So I guess that is what I'm trying to tell you.
I studied for the same reason. However, in a case where the life of someone I love is in danger, that is a whole different scenario, and in a situation like that, I will do and use anything to “win”.
So yes there will never be "any" circumstances where I would feel I could do that. Just because you don't believe me again doesn't make it not so.
I didn’t say I didn’t believe you, I asked some questions that I thought might change your answer. You still haven’t really addressed them: Could you stab someone to save your child’s life?
PS: The way I feel right now I might find myself still debating the wisdom of stopping an attack on my WW if it was by some of the BW/BGF's.
I'm not saying that I wouldn't stop a lasting harmful attack, but there were times early one where the fantasy of some of the BW/BGF's getting their revenge on her happened and I just walk away and let them.
LOL! I know the feeling!
I don't believe I'll change any minds of folks determined everyone can/will cheat, but I just wanted to answer one last point.
Not in my case anyway. But it’s not personal. Please don’t take it that way.
[This message edited by ThatWasFun at 5:50 PM, September 22nd (Wednesday)]