Okay now that we've completed (for now) the great debate on who is the biggest hyprocrite around here (pretty much all of us) I think it's time to get back to me, me, and me.
Quick update:
I met with therapist today and it was very helpful. We came up with a short plan for some next steps over the next couple of weeks. I'm going to be seeing him on a biweekly basis because I don't think I need to see him every week and because I don't want to pay him that much. He's open to that and open to stepping up the frequency if I need it.
1. We walked through everything we know now about my WW and whether she's being truthful, how the poly went down, how she behaved before and after, the factors from the affair itself and the past three years, etc. I asked him what he thought about it. His response: "It's certainly shady." This was the most candid response I've gotten from a therapist thus far; I find a lot of them hem and haw and do a lot of beard stroking.
2. He wants to help me over the next few months "learn how to be happy without relying on your WW's cooperation." His words. He wants me to be in a position where I can say yes, a woman can break my heart, but no, she can't destroy my life. He said I need to do that bc it's obvious this has destroyed me, and he never wants me to be in that position again. In other words, he wants to be vulnerable enough to trust a woman (any woman if I decided to divorce) but also resilient enough to be less dependent on the outcome of a relationship with a woman for my happiness. Nota bene: this isn't a rugsweeping maneuver. Essentially, he's recommending a soft/mid-level 180. I think this is easier for me than a hard 180. A hard 180 sounds pretty difficult to do in my situation and would be kind of like Dwight in The Office doing the "shun/unshun" maneuver (in other words, it would look and feel stupid and inauthentic). I have some issues with the 180 (similar to a critique offered by a certain lady who isn't welcome here on SI) but I think it works in the short term.
3. He said I've spent a lot of my life in my work and personal life focusing on the wellbeing of other people. Time to focus on mine.
4. As I said, essentially he wants me to work on implementing a soft 180 as I start to figure out what I want. To that end, I'm going to be celibate with my wife. I'll be telling her tonight. Sex at this point is simply muddying the waters and not allowing me to think clearly. I need to be in "monk mode" for a bit. I can easily be put in a p*ssy coma (sorry to be blunt) and I need to stop that cycle for awhile. Naturally since my sex drive is high, we will see how long I can actually do this. Maybe I'll be in monk mode for a whole day
I kid, I kid. My therapist told me to simply say I want to do this for awhile, unspecified, that I may have moments of weakness and that it isn't intended to wound or punish.
My WW and I have engaged in a high degree of very regular hysterical bonding. It's healthy and not healthy. It helps and it doesn't help. It's awesome but also makes me feel tawdry and always comes with mind movies. In other words, it's a real mindf*ck. I need to step back from it.
5. I'll be moving forward with the post nup offer from my wife. I'm pretty naïve about what these actually look like, so if anyone has any tangible suggestions on this, I'm all ears and eyes.
6. I'm seeing a divorce attorney next week to understand what a separation and divorce actually entails. I've already alluded to this, but my wife and I have a lot of practical work to do on finances and getting our home ready to sell. It's a nice home, but it needs some updating. We'd take a loss on it in the current market and I'm loathe to lose money on such an important investment. That's the cold, practical part of me talking and if that means delaying a divorce or separation so be it.
I won't be implementing an in home separation. I think these are hellish and sound nearly impossible. Frankly, our home life is very stable and we get along well (I think I've stated this before, I know it sounds weird, but it is what it is). It would be selfish and pig-headed of me to invoke an in-home separation, creating tension where there hasn't been and foist that on my kids when the tension in the household is low.
Yes, I can go to a cooking class with my wife the same day I tell her I think she's lying to me and that reconciliation is not probable without truth and transparency. Yes, again that's weird. It's been my reality the past three years.
My therapist and I today did talk about a "therapeutic separation" but this is not in-home. I'd like to talk to a divorce attorney first because to be honest I have no understanding of what the reality of the divorce process looks like at all. I've never given it a thought in my life and it's a mystery to me.
A therapeutic separation might be beneficial, but again I'm not a selfish twit and there are children to consider here and the impact adult actions have on them.
So that's a short term plan that gives me at least some forward direction now that I've completed my own patented, trademarked recommended semi-hypocritical "package of non-negotiables."
Hope you all have a great weekend.
P.S. Oh, and the "emotional restitution" phase of therapy is on hold as I implement these steps. My therapist said today they prefer to reserve emotional restitution for couples that are actively moving forward in reconciliation. I told him I understood that, but I didn't understand why that wouldn't be helpful to me in any case -- whether we R or D. In any case, that thing is not going to be happening at the moment.
[This message edited by Thumos at 3:59 PM, January 10th (Friday)]