My personal advice follows, as an attorney who used to represent kids who were wards of the state - note - this is NOT legal advice. If your WH does not intend to move to establish paternity himself now, seek advice of counsel immediately. And I wholeheartedly agree that once paternity is established that communications could go through counsel, at least until things get sorted out, if your WH wants any contact (as the court can force him to pay, but cannot force him to be involved). Here is why I say that:
What may or may not happen depends on what state you are in (if you are in the US) or the jurisdiction in which the child resides (yes - the child's residence almost always determines what law applies - but again, that could vary too). That being said, in the wrong jurisdiction, your WH may lose paternity rights if he does not step up w/in a certain period of time BUT STILL BE LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE. What that means is the OW could establish paternity 5 years from now, move for back child support, get it, and the longer it's gone on the larger that sum would be, and your WH could find himself subject to a court ordered garnishment of wages or a lien on property he owns, AND your WH would not have any legal recourse regarding what is happening with his child and would have no legal custody or the ability to get it in the future (no ability to make medical decisions, no ability to have any say in the child's life later on). Your WH could be found responsible for medical bills, and in some states, could even be found responsible for paying back any state related assistance that the OW received on behalf of the child, even if the OW didn't move to establish paternity. In some states the state will actually subpoena your WH for a paternity test if the OW seeks state financial assistance (this happened to my sister in a non-infidelity situation where she didn't want the father involved - the state involved him anyway against her will). That child could establish paternity on its own 40 years from now and would still be a legal heir to your WH's estate in the event of his death just like any of his other children etc. and would have rights whether or not you or your WH wants that to happen.
You may not care about any of this now...BUT people change their minds. Years from now your WH may wish he had established paternity, or he may find out that his child is in harms way due to OWs behavior and not be able to do anything about it. He may find he is subject to court hearing years from now...or, he may have to face a hurt and angry child coming to him and asking him why he abandoned it.
From a moral position I think your WH is doing the WRONG thing. He decided to do this - to make it a possibility...and if the OW is a "whore" in your mind (she's not, unless she was charging him - otherwise she's just garden variety liar and cheater just like your WS and mine) then your WH is acting like a "john" and shirking his responsibility to his offspring like someone who used a fake name and paid to have sex with a stranger and disappears into the night. And regardless of the underlying situation, nothing good ever comes from this type of behavior.
And based on my personal experience in representing kids who came from less than perfect homes - this 1000000 times over:
Your CH needs to step up and do the responsible thing. He needs to determine paternity. If he's the father of this child, he needs to take care of the child. The child deserves that. S/he is innocent and should not be made to suffer (and a child without a father does suffer).
Sadly, this is no longer about you or your WH or the OW - this ia first and foremost about an innocent child. My own half-sibling is the child of an affair and luckily for her, her father (who was married at the time - my mother was single and the OW) stepped up and took an active role in her life and she is ALL The better for it.
But, if you are not concerned about the child, then by not moving to establish paternity now, you could be setting yourself up for a bunch of legal problems in the future. Pretending like the child isn't his will not make those issues go away. He needs to establish paternity at bare minimum so he knows if he is indeed the father, and accept the consequences of his actions. Unfortunately you have to deal with the aftermath, and for that I am truly sorry as I'm not sure I could stick around in your situation, but pretending the child doesn't exist until the OW forces you to do otherwise is rugsweeping of the highest order.
I'm sorry for your position but from a legal standpoint I would never advise a client to bury their head in the sand. Also, as an aside, your texts/emails that say "no contact" could be seen by a court as your WH trying to actively avoid responsibility for the child - which would likely not help his position in court if it led to that.
Again, all this is my personal opinion based on what I have seen in my jurisdiction practicing law - and it is not legal advice - but it is a strong suggestion to seek legal counsel.
Oh, and Landclark - your comment wasn't insensitive. IT was reality. My post here is a big 2X4 because that's what needs to happen in this situation as unfortunate and f-ing horrible for the original poster. I do feel for her, as I'm sure you do too.
[This message edited by ThisIsSoLonely at 10:07 AM, January 7th (Tuesday)]