My prayers are for Gianna and her family who are now mourning her and her father, and for the other victims in the crash and their families who are now mourning them. I can't even imagine how much pain they might be in right now. I hope they have all the support they need, and I hope they remember the better memories they have of him, and all the emotions that go with this.
I think there's space enough to hold more than one feeling, don't you?
I came here because I've been triggering at the responses to his death - specifically, the doxxing, insults, and death threats certain people have been receiving for trying to hold both realities: that he had a family and was beloved and inspiration AND greatly harmed this woman. I believe he was guilty. So I'm worried about his victim (and possibly another) who must be triggering like hell right now to see the man who raped her and tried to destroy her truth, her reputation, and her credibility being called a hero. I can't imagine how much pain she might be in right now, though I can come close. The man who molested me as a young child died when I was about 10, and my mother to this day still doesn't believe me (but my father did). A few years ago she put pictures of that period of our lives online, including a picture of him, which a lot of people mourned over. It made me feel guilt for being his victim, like I inconvenienced everyone and him by what happened, or by being affected by it. How fucked up is that?
I read this recently, as well as other articles, that have me believing he's guilty. This is an excerpt. Please be warned: TRIGGERS.
[Dana] Easter was on loan for this prosecution because she has been a specialist in sexual assault since 1989. “This was one of the strongest cases I’ve ever seen in an acquaintance rape,” she says flatly.
First, she says, there was the physical evidence – her rape exam showed vaginal trauma, and three drops of her blood was found on Bryant’s T-shirt. Then, there was the “believability” of the two people involved. “It’s a hallmark for us when someone lies,” Easter says.
“People lie when they have something to hide.” And then there was the accuser’s story. “This was a very credible outcry,” Easter says. “She implicates herself, and is truthful about very unattractive facts about herself. I’ve seen hundreds of these cases, and you learn what a credible outcry looks like.”
Easter said the gag order let the most outrageous things stand – like the suggestion that the accuser had sex after Bryant. Only the accusation was reported, Easter stressed, not the response. If there had been a trial, she says, the prosecution’s witnesses would have shown the jury that it was “just a crock.”
As she explains, the accuser had celebrated her birthday a dozen days before the Bryant encounter with an ex-boyfriend, having unprotected sex. One of the perks of her job was that she got to have a free room at the resort for this celebration. The bag she’d taken to her birthday celebration was still unpacked in her bedroom. She said she grabbed a pair of panties from the bag when she went in for her rape exam.
Easter surmises that sperm on those panties showed up in the DNA test. But she says her experts could have proved that that didn’t mean she had sex after the Bryant encounter, because “it was old sperm – there were no tails left on the sperm,” so it couldn’t have come from a recent ejaculation. (emphasis mine)
But nobody ever heard any of the rebuttal (nor the prosecution’s challenge that the test sample was also contaminated). All that the public heard was the charge, which came in a most suspicious way – the court mistakenly e-mailed this closed-door testimony to dozens of news organizations. This was the fourth time that court clerks had revealed information that was supposed to remain sealed until the trial. Although every leak hurt the prosecution, Easter says she accepts the court’s contention that all were simply mistakes made by court personnel.
“We never had a chance to submit a case,” she says. “The defense used the media to color the public opinion. We had gone through two days of jury selection [before the accuser pulled out], and I was very, very pleased with the open-minded [candidates]. They entertained the possibility that the media had been leading them astray.”
Why this bothers me, even though I obviously didn't know anyone involved personally, is that it set the tone or continued setting the tone for how sexual assault victims are treated. They are not believed. They are slandered, their lives are torn apart, and their abuser can walk away with their lives better than ever. Their abuser can be amazing and beloved in everyone's eyes, and everyone can think the abuser is the victim instead. The victim can be forgotten, or only remembered with vile names. And others who have been sexually assaulted or abused are taught to remain silent, so the same won't happen to them.
That's a very heavy price to pay for a choice she didn't even make.
I didn't wish death on him. I'm not happy he's dead. I don't even think it was karma. I think it was tragic.
I'm allowed to feel for his victim too.
R.I.P. to everyone on that helicopter.