Valentinessucks
I want to start from the end and begin with your last post because as standing opposed to those who tried to claim that I disrespect people who chose to reconcile you are an example of reconciling partner that I respect and admire. Seems like contradiction? Actually no, because, you are truthful about the nature of what you've done not trying to deny, rug sweep and so on. I can understand that not everyone can follow because of various different reasons and enforce their beliefs – both men as well as women. Yet, you are truthful about it and this is a good reason to admire you even if you didn't do what I believe had to be done. I'm sure your honesty and truthfulness helps you a lot to deal with a situation that might be not easy at all.
What I criticize is indeed the concept of reconciliation as in regard to infidelity but not the person itself. I think you mention it between the lines but I'm not angry with the people that attacked me on my attitudes because I do believe it was not from a place to hurt me but most probably from a place of difficulty or maybe even hurt and pain. However, in the same way that I understand that to a certain degree when dealing with those problems we can't completely divide between the general and the personal aspect of the thread meaning taking things in proportion, I hope that other people can understand and do the same. I can't come to ask for support, stating I am going to divorce but saying anything about the reason because someone would misinterpret it as personal attack.
Wouldn't I be attacked and even more for such a stance being described for good reason as unreasonable and ignorant person who have knee jerk reaction without knowing what I am doing. At the end, I'll have to explain it and we would be at the same point that some people will misinterpret the things I'm saying. I am truly sorry if someone took it personally, but in the specific paragraphs that were quoted and other I mentioned not one, not two and not three times that it is for me so; that it is how I see things. Other people are entitled to other opinions and that's o.k. Maybe, I should state it more time and I accept it. Most probably, I missed to point it more as the first post was difficult for me and I'll be more aware of that. Thanks again, I am grateful for your support and supportive of the decisions you made.
Now, some other poster tried to portray me as either being ignorant or incapable of understanding the process of forgiveness and reconciliation. I want to explain how I see it. First of all what I was criticizing was the concept of reconciliation and not forgiveness as in regard to infidelity. I think in one section I mentioned them together but besides of this I was oposing reconciliation, not forgiveness. Why? So, let's explore how I understand it. It that sense, I think that forgiveness is very important for me, but it has nothing to do with reconciliation.
It is important for me at least because of three main reasons:
1. If I don't forgive I may become a prisoner of my past and thus suffering with no end
2. If I chose to give up on any romantic relationship, which is what I want right now, simply because of my lack of trust, so it must come from a place of forgiveness, acceptance and self-love; otherwise, it is hateful escapism, anger and fear which are not conducive to happiness
3. If I will chose in the future to be in a relationship with another woman, I have to let go and forgive my wife because otherwise she would poison this new relationship by being some ghost or phantom hanging over our heads. It would not be only disrespectful and unfair to the new woman in my life but I would consider it as a kind of infidelity and unfaithfulness because I can't provide her undivided attention, affection, care and support because no matter for what reason, even hate and anger, my thoughts are consumed with another woman
Chifrudo, mentioned that all philosophical paths and thoughts claim that forgiveness and reconciliation I more difficult. I disagree and it is only partially correct. All philosophical and religious paths claim that compassion, forgiveness and love are difficult. No such thought or spiritual path forces you to reconcile with cheaters. I come from a spiritual path that put such great emphasize on it, but it not requires me to reconcile. I WILL FORGIVE MY WIFE for the abuse and trauma she inflicted on me, but I never, ever, reconcile with her and give her another chance to maybe abuse me once again. Period!
Moreover, HouseOfPlane, mentioned that my wife actually owns my head and my planes after divorce are showing that what I'm doing will not bring happiness, because I'm into punishing her and not forgiving. Wrong, it's me begging, pleading and behaving with no self-respect would be such a thing. The truth is that in order to be truly happy forgiveness is not the only requirement and it is not enough. One need at least some degree of wisdom learned from what happened and it must come from a place of security, not fear. If forgiveness is coming from a place of fear and ignorance, it's not genuine forgiveness but more of a masochism and self-hate. In the bottom line, true forgiveness can come only if both parties are hold in the equation of compassion, not only my wife but me too.
Why this insight is important, because if for example a woman would be abused by her husband, physically, verbally, emotionally and otherwise – no one with right senses would tell her to forgive and see him unprotected because otherwise it is not conducive to her happiness. In that case, as I already said, my wife is the abuser and perpetrator and I am the abused and victim, so claiming taking care of my security is somehow not conducive to my happiness, well let's say it's a little bit of a double standard. It's the exact twisted phenomena of the damsel in distress and the bad guy syndrome. She is not a damsel in distress and I am not the bad guy so what I am doing is indeed conducive to my happiness. It's not punishing her but protecting my-self – plain and simple! If she feels punished it's only her stupidity that brought her there, not me. Think before you act and actions have consequences as I said.
Notthevictem
Thanks for the advice.
Journaling and exercising can be great; I'll definitely do this! As to drinking so along with smoking I don't drink at all (don't use alcohol) so that's not a problem
HollyHell
I agree with you that anger is of no use and not a healthy emotion. However, I also believe it is unhealthy both to suppress as well as acting on that anger. I do try to practice letting on so that it will disappear on its own way. I am much better now and will continue to work on letting go on it. It does give me great deal of suffering and I see it. I am not approaching it heedlessly. The only thing I partially disagree with you is on the statement that she's not some rancid hellspawn who tricked you for 15 years. I mean this is one possibility; the other one is that she is like this, which I tend to believe. Either way, I have to learn to let go of the anger and practice forgiveness (not reconciliation) as I already mentioned.
YearsOfPain25
Thanks for your post. It was very helpful and opened my eyes to aspects I did not consider before. You mentioned the need of my wife to work on her-self for the sake of the children. Right now, this is what happening. However, I have no control of what happens when we are divorce; I can't make any claims or tell her what to do.
Some poster wrongly stated her that divorcing instead of reconciling is avoiding risks and uncertainty. Wrong, a person who divorce undergoes immense risks as well as uncertainty. The only thing we avoid is a proven cheater and us adding un-necessary and spin off uncertainty to a world and reality that is uncertain anyway. As a man the risks are huge:
1. Being potentially alienated from your children
2. Serving as ATM while having little or no contact with the children
3. Financial loss
4. False claim of domestic violence and many more
I've researched it, it is unbelievable what men have to endure (women too)
So, this is another thing that can be very problematic. Any idea how to handle this best? It would be really appreciated
You asked me why she confessed. Her version, she didn't want to lie and the guilt. In my opinion it was a combination of this as well as the fear of getting caught
You asked me why she cheated. I have an assumption over this. Yet, it's unimportant; she must find it out, yet me not wanting to reconcile is putting me on the position to insist on it. Maybe, I'm wrong! I would like to hear your opinion
Merida and StillStanding1, I am not going to abandon my children! I also agree after reading the responses here that going abroad at this stage which is fragile for the children is not good. I'll have to find a better way to detox myself from her, spend quality time with myself while not hurting my children. I will do these adjustments and I thank everyone who opened my eyes on it. I am also sure that I will need advice and maybe counseling if there is such thing on how effectively to co parent with here. I hope she agrees to do this. I am more concerned right now of losing access and contact with my children rather to abandon them. Divorce does not mean I am out of their live and I hope my wife understands it and will not resort in the future to revenge tactics because I decided to divorce her.
Chifrudo
I have already addressed the points on forgiveness to Valentinessucks
"I see this a lot on these boards and, frankly, I think it is bullshit. We have all betrayed our spouses in ways large and small"
No, we have not all betrayed our partners in that extent and depth and this is both, the false equivalency cheater want to manipulate betrayed spouses into believing as well as the damsel in distress and the bad guy phenomena. We also not all have betrayed their spouses even if we all have wrong our loved ones. Most people do not murder, cheat and abuse. I have done nothing of this infidelity shit not only to her but also to other women prior to her. So, I'm NOT ON THE SAME LEVEL AS HER and to adopt that lack self –respect, lack of self-esteem and self-hate. Yes, I've done wrong, yes I made mistakes, no I didn’t do what she has done (if she wishes I'll go to polygraph), thus I'm am morally superior to a cheater and her cheating on me means she is not my equal. What is so hard to understand here! It's very simple, no need to complicate things!
"I think that all or nearly all of us are capable of infidelity"
Being able in theory of infidelity is not the same as being able to practice it reality. Most people do not practice it. Why? It is actually irrelevant: they are more self-aware, wiser, less entitled, have morals, have boundaries, coping skill, add whatever you want. Some do not do this. Period!
- Good people can do bad things. This is simply a fact. A refusal to acknowledge it doesn't make it less true.
No, that's cheater think that cheaters try to manipulate us into it. Once again, it's me and don't take it personally, but it is the mental Gymnastic through which truth is suppressed and of course once again in my opinion bending the truth in that way does not make it less truthful. Good people can do bad things; evil people cheat on their loved ones.
- Have you ever done something wrong? If you were remorseful, how would you want to be treated?"
I have done many wrong things, were remorseful, sometimes forgiven and sometimes not. However, being truly remorseful I was never angry with those who haven’t forgiven ne, I learned to let go, to forgive my-self and move on. However, I have never, but never, done that kind of evil. Never wanted, do not want right now (as revenge affair) and will never want. I'm not a cheater and never will be!
Dismayed2012
Thanks a lot for your post; it is eye opening on what happened to you.
Nekonamida
Thanks
HouseOfPlane
As with Chiefrudo, the first part of your post I answered above. Anyway, in the second half you wrote:
Ever heard of Hanlon's Razor? Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
Wrong, evil is always connected to stupidity (ignorance) and is always rooted there. If evil was not rooted in ignorance but wisdom, which is a contradiction, then it would be impossible, hence wise and self-aware people do not do that things, hence they are wise enough to understand the consequences. If they didn't they were not wise enough. The only validity I see in your statement is that evil rooted in ignorance and stupidity is indeed forgivable, however as stated above it does not equal and by definition requires or equals reconciliation. By the way, I even don't need to tell her that I forgive her. Just to forgive, that's all!
Bigger
I do believe that people who transform from infidelity are special and even more than this in my eyes almost saints. I do think such people do exist and happy that those are the moderators here. Anyway, I think you haven't really understood what I have written on the concept of reconciliation, simply because the notion you wrote in your response is incorrect. However, I don't want to go deeper into that as it seems that it is triggering or is at least causing people to interpret it as though I am hostile to people who reconcile. I outlined it above.
Wk55hn
Are you curious how your wife came to cheat?
Well, curious might be the wrong term. On one level, I don't give a shit why she cheated because I won't let me into the position of blaming my-self for it (she does it neither). Second, I don't buy the FOO issues as a reason to cheat. Almost everyone has FOO issues, but the majority does not use it as excuse. I don't buy the mental issues too and she has no mental problems. I think I know why she cheated but me not wanting to reconcile does not make me in the position to demand that. I do think on the other had that it is important to her. She must work it out. That is something different and maybe could be interesting to know
What was her behavior throughout the marriage?
Nothing has pointed to that, at least nothing I was able to notice
Were you happy with her before this?
Look, we were happy although as with every marriage there were up and downs. We worked through and I can't remember that when she had issues and brought it I did not do what has to be done to address it. I am sure it would have not be different this time if she was unhappy with something
Who was the guy?
She had a few female friends and it is someone she knew over them. I must admit I didn't like group of her friends. Anyway, now she's cut contact with all of them all together.
[This message edited by ImGoneByTheDown at 2:38 PM, October 17th (Saturday)]