I do think that, for those who are not yet ready, the advice here can be too much to tolerate. I think this is why many leave. I think many of the same people return when they're in a different headspace. But like any community, it's not for everyone.
I've been here for years--far longer than reflected below. For the first handful of years, I was not receptive to the advice. I was not in a place, emotionally, where I could move forward with the things recommended.
I was not ready. I wish I had been---SI could have spared me a great deal of pain had I been in the right headspace.
I was not there.
But SI --with its MANY voices (which are not nearly as in unison as can feel when you are hearing something you don't want to hear)--is here. It was here when I was not ready. It was here when I was.
When I was not yet ready, I was treated respectfully. I didn't always like what I heard, but my lack of readiness and receptiveness was MY responsibility. Others still tried to help. If it was wrong for me, it was my responsibility to leave. I did, more than once. I lurked for long expanses of time. When I was ready, there was encouragement, but never smugness. There was relief, but never judgment. People cared. They always had.
I am always a little perplexed about the allegations of cliquishness here. I have felt a lot of things, but I have never felt as though there are cliques. I can't even begin to identify a group I'd consider a clique.
I do think there are many oft-repeated truisms. I agree they are not one hundred percent applicable to every situation. They are widely applicable to most--and almost every response to individuals I've seen includes consideration of individual details. We may say, "but your situation is NOT unique!" But that doesn't mean we don't consider the very unique details of a person's story before seeing how is IS like ours. If you read the long, caring responses written, you will not see just a mindless recitation of dogma; you will see individual and thoughtful responses that address individual concerns. You will see great thought given to the details of a situation that make it unique. And then, you will see advice that is tied to a vast body of experience from people who HAVE been there.
No one can make you follow it. I never felt judged when I didn't (and trust me-I was a poster child for what NOT to do). But damn, good advice chafes when you want to hear something else. That somehow, you're the exception. The advice chafes even when given by anonymous posters on a message board who are NOT judging you--just sharing their experience. I think that does drive some away.
The good thing is that, if you decide this is a place for you, and that the information is of value, you will always be accepted. No, not because you accept the dogma and adopt the party line, but because people who really DO remember you, your story, what makes you different will be genuinely pleased you are working toward a healthier, happier life. We'd be great with that no matter how you went about it, really.
ETA: I strongly disagree that there is an emphasis on divorce on SI. While some of us do take that route, many of us worked very hard, first, to R. Central to the SI milieu is the belief that a marriage can survive infidelity. It may not survive other things--but it can survive infidelity. Those of is whose marriages have not survived are not, by and large, angry and bitter--and it's unfair and offensive to be characterized that way.
[This message edited by solus sto at 9:14 AM, August 10th (Sunday)]