Pine,
Could you elaborate?
You say there are no more revelations of significance.
1) When did this become apparent? Did you have a talk to her in the framework I suggested or was this just yet one more conversation of the kind you two have been having over the last weeks?
2) What is “significance”? Did you define physical activity? Look – we have had numerous WS that didn’t consider a hand-job, oral or phone-sex as “sex”. I even remember at least two cases where the WS insisted there was no sex because the male didn’t ejaculate in the woman. You really need a clear definition of “significant” …
Back in the days I joined the police. At the academy, we had an instructor in investigative techniques and procedures that would often say “when you hear the beating of hooves you think horses, not zebras”. He used that saying to remind us that we could expect a foregone conclusion, but had to be open for something else. For example; if I was asked to investigate vandalism I would right away start by talking to the group of young teenage men with spray-can marks on their hands, but I would be a fool to ignore the middle-aged property owner filling out the insurance claims...
Most (if not all) of us suspect there is more to your wife’s story than no-sex. I gave it a 20% chance of being true (and that was me being optimistic). But there is still that small chance it is true… We all have to be open for that. Maybe – just maybe – you won the lottery.
You must grasp and convey to your wife the seriousness of the poly.
Imagine this scenario: Imagine she fails the question “did you have sex with OM”. The examiner gives a 99% result.
OK – If she did have sex with the OM then why should she willingly take the poly knowing that question would pop up? Could be because she didn’t consider him fondling her breasts as sex, or her giving him a BJ, or him fingering her (sorry for being so explicit. I try not to be this graphic unless I think it serves a purpose or reason. I also want to apologize for inserting hypothetical sexual situations in the following text. It serves a purpose but does not necessarily reflect what your wife might have done). A good examiner will interview your WW before the poly and will define all the terms being used. The examiner will have stated “by sex I am referring to oral stimulation, fondling, sexual gratification [and so on]…”. MAYBE your WW all of a sudden realizes that when she jerked him off in the supplies room WAS sex.
So imagine being in the car after she fails the poly…
She’s going to start by focusing on the 99% accuracy. She can probably find surveys that show the accuracy as low as 80%. Remember you are still in a marriage that we give at best a 20% chance of knowing the truth…
Then she’s going to focus on the definitions not having been clear. She thought you were only referring to “proper” sex in a bed with penetration. So, she grudgingly admits to a BJ (but still hides the intercourse-session in the meeting-room after work).
You – desperately holding on to the marriage – agree to a new confession and a new poly where the definition of sex is “Did you give OM a BJ?” The question must be narrowed down because we already know she will fail the “Did you have sex with the OM” question. Only – the latter question let’s her get away with having had OM over in your house, in your bed, in your sheets… You are left with a bit more info, but still not the truth.
This is why IMHO the poly needs to be the single most important reason you decide what fork to take – R or D. It’s a one-off deal. It defines where you place your effort. IF she lies – irrespective of passing or failing the poly – you will NEVER reach R. N E V E R.
Another think to consider: IF she passes then the poly needs to convince YOU that you have enough truth to move on. You have to work on your doubts about the extent of the sex. That’s tough… but IF she’s telling the truth and IF there was no sex… YOU need to work on that aspect in your mind-movies and all that.
Finally, two suggestions:
I am going to support the idea to read Not Just Friends. It’s the go-to-book in EA’s. Both of you read it and both of you do the exercises.
The lingerie… IMHO it’s a distraction. If the lingerie is a trigger, then there is a simple solution: You tell your wife that her lingerie is a major trigger and therefore is has a reverse effect on you. You two go take all the content of her sexy-lingerie drawer and burn it. She then goes and buys one or two pieces and you work on it from there.
Pine – I want to point out one major thing:
You are there. She is there. It’s clear you both want the marriage. Either of you could leave right now. Either could initiate divorce. But neither has. This is such a clear statement that neither WANTS to end the marriage.
But… the affair killed whatever you had. It’s like your dream-house caught fire. Only a real fool would sit in the burnt living-room, on the remains of the favorite couch watching the non-functional, semi-burnt best-ever big-screen TV.
After a house-fire you need to evaluate the damage and then work on repairs. How much you loved the house and how much you want to remain there is totally irrelevant. What matters is the extent of the damage and the work required to repair. If the foundations are destroyed… then maybe that house can’t be rebuilt.
I THINK (and this is totally MY evaluation) your house might be damaged but fixable. But while your wife insists the floor-beams are OK and you aren’t totally convinced… To fix you need to really know the extent of the damage. Those hidden, damaged floor-beams can be just as dangerous for her as they are for you.