Arbuom,
Look up a thread by Pineapple. In many ways, a comparable story. You can learn both what to do and not to do from reading his thread.
I think you have a recoverable situation if that was what you wanted. But I also fully get it if you have reached your deal breaker and want out. It’s completely up to you. I have said this numerous times here on this site: The destination is neither R nor D, the destination is to get out of infidelity. Those two options (R and D) are simply paths that will get you out of infidelity. Fortunately, these paths share a long intimal stretch, and once they fork they run parallel to each other for some time. It’s relatively late along the path out of infidelity where they really start going in totally different directions.
R or D are both good ways out of infidelity. In R both spouses recognize the wrongdoing, acknowledge it’s existence, fully understand the depth and scope and both work hard at creating a marriage both are fully content with. In D you simply remove the cause of the infidelity – your wayward spouse – and then focus on YOUR healing.
There is a third path too often taken. That’s carrying on the path you seem to have been on for some time. To your benefit, you recognize it isn’t sustainable, that you are only trying to keep things calm, but haven’t dealt with the infidelity. Too many couples stick on this path without ever dealing with the real issues.
Keep in mind that the concept of emotional infidelity is relatively new. The phrase was first coined 1980-90 or so, and even today there are numerous MC’s, priests, guides and what-nots that don’t acknowledge EA’s for what they are.
I think your wife doesn’t recognize her friendship with OM as infidelity. She doesn’t recognize the emotional slope she was on.
Like Pineapples wife your wife insists there was no physical interaction. Just like we told him then we – the collective experience here on SI – seriously doubt that’s true. Not that it matters if you are determined to divorce, but realize this: To RECONCILE you truly need to know what you are reconciling from. IF you try to R then one major, pan important factor will be that YOU believe you know the truth and that your wife believes she has told the truth. If you decide to R then PA or not becomes important to know.
Just like I did with the afore-mentioned Pineapple I will add that MAYBE your wife is telling the truth about this not being physical. But IMHO that’s Powerball odds…
The go-to-book for emotional affairs is Not Just Friends by the late Dr. Shirley Glass. It’s easily available online and if you and WW were to decide to work at R I would suggest your first step would be to read that book TOGETHER.
But then…
Maybe divorce is the path for you.
What I will suggest is that you make your path clear to your wife:
“Wife. The present situation isn’t sustainable. You are totally free to go see OM, be with OM, hang around with OM and spend all the time you want with OM. But not as my wife. I am not going to control you, but even more then I totally refuse to SHARE you. With the emotions, you have already told me you have for OM and the emotions you have for me then at best I am sharing you with him. I refuse to share. So, I am relieving you of all marital obligations.
So, go see OM, be with OM and whatever you want. It’s nothing to do with me anymore.
I will start the process of formally terminating our marriage. I will strive to ensure the process is as fair as possible but since I am too emotionally attached to this marriage then direct any questions or comments to my attorney Mr. I Eatsharks of Eatsharks, Grizzlykiller and S. Windler, attorneys at law.
There might be a small window of opportunity where I am open for reconciliation if the correct actions are accepted. But that window is closing fast and I am fully content with losing you being the lesser of two evils, compared to sharing you with OM. If you want that opportunity you need to tell me clearly in a very direct way.”
Then walk away. Go watch your favorite program or make a sandwich. She comes along and says you are too controlling:
“I am sorry you feel that way. If we were working at our marriage, then this is something we could address in MC. Since you are committed to your affair then there isn’t any need for us to address this issue.”
No matter what she accuses you of the above is the standard answer. No matter what. You do NOT enter arguments.
She tells you she wants the Merc, the Cadillac and the house: “I am too emotionally attached to this marriage. Direct all your suggestions to my attorney Mr. I Eatsharks of Eatsharks, Grizzlykiller and S. Windler, attorneys at law.”
She tells you that you aren’t being fair: : “I am too emotionally attached to this marriage. Direct all your suggestions to my attorney Mr. I Eatsharks of Eatsharks, Grizzlykiller and S. Windler, attorneys at law.”
Finally:
People – maybe especially wayward wife’s – have a strange misconception of divorce. I have yet to meet a single divorced person that thinks they got a good deal in the settlement. Somehow having half of what you have is always less than owning half of the combined total. It’s been suggested you tell OMW that you are possibly divorcing. The goal behind that suggestion is twofold:
There is the moral reason. That in itself should be enough.
Then there is the practical reason: Somehow being told by your lover that no – they can’t support you to the standard you are used to and that maybe the lover might just focus on his wife for some time… tends to bring WW down-to-earth and out of the fog.