At the same time I'm improving myself to become more confident/assertive/dominant
Randy1133, it worries me that you put dominant and confident/assertive in the same category. Dominance is not an improvement. If your perception of strength lies in dominating others, then it is others' submissiveness that is defining your strength.
In my opinion there is a biological basis for women being attracted simultaneously to both “alpha” traits (which suggest good genes and physical safety for children) and “beta” traits (which suggest continued commitment and resources for raising the children).
PlanC, that essentially means women want men to be both strong and vulnerable, assertive and caring, depending on the situation. That's stating the obvious, isn't it? Don't men want the same?
Game is not nonsense. Well, it's nonsense to spend a lot of time to learn it, but it isn't nonsense in that it is effective and it does greatly improve your chances of sleeping with a lot of women.
...there are a ton of stories on here where male AP's "dropped game" on a WW and it went from "happy marriage" to blown up. Had that person not come along, and not known how to lie effectively to women to get them to drop their panties as fast as possible, the A never would have happened.
When women 'drop their panties' it is because they want to. This alpha pick up game only works with certain types of women who are looking to flirt. I personally find such alpha posturing ridiculous, and men who behave in that way the least attractive.
Why not just treat your partner like a person? Why make it a man/woman thing? We'd have a lot more in common if people were willing to refer to each others' good/bad/crazy/indifferent habits as HUMAN habits, rather than assign a gender to them for that gender's eventual stereotyping.
well said, silverhopes.
3.) Women, Logic & Emotional Reasoning:
Women are irrational and inconsistent, they have a capacity for logic but they are not typically inclined to utilise it. Women must exert concentrated effort to be logical for it is not their factory setting, men on the other hand although imperfect have a far more pronounced affinity for logic. As such by matter of preference if not biology, men are near universally superior logicians and decision makers.
Is this a joke? I am female, and my predominant thinking pattern is logic. Are there some men stupid enough to believe this nonsense?
4.) Woman’s Manipulative Nature:
Women are Machiavellian by nature. In comparison to the average man, they are far more proficient in matters of persuasion and general social manipulation.
And another generalisation. Some women are good at it, just as some men are.
Listen, it's cold, it's hard to hear, but it's also true, women are generally at the peak of their sexual attractiveness from around 18-25. Does that statement make you uncomfortable? What if I told you that men are typically at the peak of their physical prowess between 18-25? Because that is also true, and, just like women, our physical ability begins to fall off after that.
Agree that those abilities may decline after a certain age. Problem is when you measure a person's worth purely based on those qualities and call them depreciating assets. A woman is not measured by her attractiveness to men, nor is a man measured by his attractiveness to women. Their worth is measured by who they are as human beings, their principles, their contribution to society. If I, as a woman, only looked for an athletic, wealthy partner, I would be a very shallow person.
Real strength is from within. It does not require external validation of alpha status. It does not require others to look up to you. It dose not require a submissive partner to make you feel good.
I am a female executive in a global company, responsible for 300 odd staff in about six countries. I am fairly attractive, I frequently travel for work with male colleagues, there are loads of dinners and parties. I am highly confident and assertive. But I have never even crossed a boundary in my marriage. No one even dare try to flirt with me. Why, because I have a huge amount of respect for my marriage and my DH.
My DH is highly intelligent, perhaps off the charts intelligent, can converse about history, philosophy, literature, politics with some of the high profile people from UN, he is assertive without being dominant, he is confident, but doesn't feel the need to undermine others. He is neither alpha nor beta. He is an amazing human being who is strong, confident, caring and vulnerable. And we are true partners. Neither of us fit the red pill philosophy.
[This message edited by Ephimera at 4:15 PM, February 1st (Thursday)]
