Hi Reen,
I think it is always best to occupy the middle ground before you have a clear picture of a situation.
It would be counter-productive for you to rug-sweep this when it clearly bothers you, and has the potential to bother you for years if you do not get more clarity.
It would be counter-productive for you to take what little you know about that incident and exaggerate it into a marriage-busting campaign of malign deceit that has lasted two decades.
It would be counter-productive for you to not tell your wife that this new revelation bothers you, and that you need more information about it to be able to process it.
If something troubles you, you don't call Ghostbusters, you talk to your spouse. It is when people stop talking their troubles over with their spouse that deeper problems begin.
So when you say this...
I hope she is forthcoming and not annoyed because it was so long ago.
...I have to agree with you, because a reaction like that is not going to help you get closure on this, and does not give proper weight and respect to your feelings.
I think it would be a very good idea to make a list of questions and issues that you want to discuss. Hopefully, if you can cover all the stuff that is bothering you, you may only need a single discussion about it. However, it is perfectly legitimate if you need more than that.
It is intriguing that your wife suddenly brought this up after twenty years, and I would want to ask why. She lied about it at the time, hid it for twenty years, and then suddenly, one insignificant "nothing happened" night from all that time ago was at the forefront of her mind, and something she brought up after a few beers.
You wonder if your wife may be annoyed that you are concerned about such an ancient event, and yet she herself thought it was important enough to bring up after twenty years' silence about it. So how can she blame you for treating it as important, when she thought it was important enough to talk about when she could have talked about a million other things?
And I think that may be what makes you uneasy about this, more than any suspicions about deeper, darker stuff.
Do you think that timing may have some bearing on it? The event happened twenty years ago, but you have been married for nineteen, which means you are heading for your twentieth wedding anniversary. Is it possible that your wife is trying to come clean before that happens, so that she can go into it with no skeletons rattling in a closet?
That may seem fanciful, but why else mention it now? People do assess their lives when these milestone anniversaries approach, just as they do with significant birthdays. It will be interesting to ask her why she broke her silence on the subject after all this time.
The next obvious questions would be:
- Who was he?
- How did you meet him?
- How long were you seeing him for?
- Where did you go on that evening, and what did you do? (I am not sure why you are so adamant that she did not get to the concert; is it only because of her vague answers in that phone call, or do you have some other proof of that?)
- How did you end it with him?
- Have you had any contact with him since then?
- Why did you do it?
I also think that the discussion should be about more than just questions. You have written a lot here about how you viewed the commitment level of your relationship back then, and how this revelation has rocked that impression on its foundations.
Tell her that.
Tell her about the level of uncertainty that event has put into your mind, and why it bothers you. And frame it by telling her that you need her help to feel better about it. If you put it like that, it makes it harder for her to respond incredulously or call you paranoid.
And on the off-chance that she still does, you can always say, "You thought it was significant enough to bring up after twenty years, so I think it is significant enough to want the full story".
To start speculating further about what may or may not have happened is pointless. Having the discussion is the best next step to take, and if you work yourself up into too much of a lather beforehand, it will skew the discussion, and you may end up trying to make the answers fit a conclusion that you reached before you even ask the first question.
Think about what you want to know, think about what you want to tell her, and work on it together.
It isn't a police interrogation, it is a married couple discussing something that troubles one of them. That is healthy. If the marriage really is as good as you say it is, you should work pretty well as a team after twenty years.
I hope you get the clarity and resolution you need on this, Reen.
[This message edited by M1965 at 2:38 PM, August 14th (Wednesday)]