They [BS] need and want touch, the care the company. At the same time they reject it, pull Away or push me away and refuse to accept affection
Keep in mind this rejection is our lizard brain doing the thing it was designed to do: protect us from harm. Tho the scars are emotional, our lizard brain still knows we've been harmed, and after dday it works on overtime to try and protect us from experiencing it again. This is why my response to my WH during triggers is often - become a SAFE partner for me. THAT is the thing I want from him. I want him to fix his shit so he can be a partner who is safe enough for me and my lizard brain to relax more.
I must remember that the anger and the rejection are based on a huge need to reconnect, to feel loved.
I'm not 100% certain I agree, but if this works for you and your BS, then great! Personally, I think the anger and rejection stem from being deeply hurt - for me it's a PRIMAL hurt. I don't think my anger is bc I want to reconnect - it's bc i thought I WAS connected, but my reality was based upon an illusion perpetrated by my WH. IOW, ANYONE is angry when they are defrauded... and having an A is the ultimate (primal) fraud. If someone stole from you, you'd be angry. And it would not be bc you need to reconnect with the thief. IMO, having an A is stealing the BS' very reality.
I do have to work on staying calmer always, not try to argue anything when the flooding is occurring.
This is important. And this would cause me concern in that it's not just when the flooding is occurring. IOW, it's important to distinguish when one is expressing FEELINGS or FACTS.
When one is expressing feelings, there is NO arguing. For example, if I say I'm feeling sad because it's raining, responding with something like "it's not raining, it's only a little sprinkle" is NOT empathetic and is NOT validating. An empathetic response (even if it's a beautiful sunny day) is something like: I understand... I get sad too when the weather isn't what I'd hoped.
Now, in the context of a BS/WS, I think a better response would be something like: I'm sorry that my lies and secret sexual life have caused you to be sad when the weather isn't what you expected. (not a great example, but best I've got off the top of my head).
An awful response in the BS/WS context would be: It's not raining, and I don't understand why you can't see that! (or in A speak, anything that includes or implies the word ONLY, anything that minimizes the pain, anything that questions the BS' reality - even when it looks to the WS to be devoid of any semblance of factual underpinnings).
I'm a BS, but this is something I'm trying to work on as well - not just with WH, but in all aspects of life. And there are times it can be hard, esp when I feel defensive.
Being empathetic and validating another's feelings does not mean that when the conversation is factual, the WS (or anyone) cannot try to set the record straight as to their perception. Example: it's raining. Response: Hmm, it looks to me like it's just a bit of a drizzle. This conversation is not about feelings, but about facts or perception.
I think a WS still needs to tread very lightly when it comes to perceptions - esp about the M or the A (at least until some level of trust and ability to speak about such things calmly is restored). IOW, if the BS says "you spent more time thinking about your AP than me", that is a perception, rooted in a feeling of (perhaps) abandonment (or something else). Responding "no, I didn't" may be factually accurate, but it's not very empathetic, even when the statement doesn't specifically mention any feeling.
Others probably have better responses, but if my WH had said something along the lines of I understand that my A causes you to question where my head was during that time, I'm so sorry that I destroyed your trust by engaging with AP. That would be helpful. Instead, he pretty regularly would (and does) reply: that is not true, or I didn't think about her much at all outside of our conversations or meetings. My problem with the latter is (1) if trust has not been restored, it will just sound like another lie to try and minimize the damage (and if there is ANY scintilla of factual inaccuracy it can turn it all into a big trigger [eg, I have written evidence my WH would initiate communication - so he HAD to be thinking of her "outside" of that in order to initiate the contact]) (2) my brain ca see it as another way in which my reality is being manipulated by my WH, on TOP of the reality busting that occurs just by having an A.
In the moments of most intense flooding, when perhaps you felt so alone, maybe that your mate does not understand you or your pain/anger/resentment
TBH, I don't think it's possible for a WS to understand the depth of the pain of being betrayed by their spouse. If anyone had told me what this is like before dday, I would have said they are lying. Many describe it as worse than the loss of a loved one (even a child). It is exponentially worse than any pain I've ever experienced (and that includes some pretty f*cked up FOO). I did not think it was even possible to hurt this much and still be alive.
Do you feel differently about your mate and their behavior, their helpfulness or lack there of, when you are not flooded?
I suspect that this varies from minute to minute for most BSs, and the WS' work and growth is a big factor. Personally, I just don't see my WH the same as I did before I found out, and I don't know if that will ever return. But I now struggle with his behavior AFTER dday. Many folks on SI will say it, and I wholeheartedly agree - that for those who are willing to consider R, it's not the A that ends the M, it's all the bullshit the WS does AFTER the A that kills it. It is absolutely true for me. IOW, I've come a long way in processing and accepting that the A happened. What gets my goat today has FAR more to do with my WH's continued inability to communicate, lack of empathy, the post dday lies, the lack of the kind of timeline I've begged for since dday, the lack of emotional courage, etc. I don't know who said it, but there's a quote that basically says what defines us is not our failures/bad choices... it is how we respond to them. So if a WS responds with the same selfishness, entitlement, self victimization, minimizing, defensiveness, etc as they embodied during their A, the BS is hard pressed to have any hope that anything can be rebuilt from the ashes of the M that was killed by the A.