Can you point out examples where the WS admitted to the BS sex was better with AP in cases the WS wanted R ?
Exactly. Because it's not.
You proved the point perfectly.
You just made a mass generalization.
UN123: Go to the Philosophy department of your local college and ask to speak to a professor. Ask the professor to show you the devastating weaknesses in your argument.
***
Waited, I call this an over-generalization because it's based on too small a sample. We can assume that either sex was better or wasn't better, but we don't have enough evidence to know which is true.
IOW, I'm not saying the generalization is true or untrue. I'm saying we just can't know at this point whether it's true or untrue.
*****
My W said that the first few sessions were really special. She just said a moment ago (I asked) that ow did at least one thing that was better than what I did.
She also said that sex with the ap became a bore. She said she continued having sex with her in part to teach her to have sex as good as it was with me.
You know what? I'm glad my W likes sex with me, but that does nothing to mitigate the pain of her sharing herself with someone else.
IOW, I believe you would feel no better than you do now even if your W said you were a sex god who was better at sex than everyone else. If she did, my bet is that you'd just look for another comparison with which to beat yourself up.
*****
It is absolutely true that it's possible that sex for some WSes was different, not better.
You do not accept that possibility. That, ipso facto, demonstrates you are not thinking straight.
That's a real problem, one that only you can solve. You CAN solve it, but first you have to recognize and accept it.
*****
Contradictions in your posting:
You believe your W is lying about her A sex.
There are tons of SIers and former SIers who will testify that one CANNOT R(econcile) with someone who continues to lie.
You say you refuse to let yourself be with a W who had better sex with someone than with you.
You believe your W had better sex with her ap than with you.
And yet you haven't D'ed.
Numerous fWSes on SI say the sex was different, not better.
You refuse to believe them.
Overall, I believe you're fucking yourself up. I urge you to stop.
I believe you haven't D'ed yet because somewhere inside you there's someone who knows you're fucking yourself up and is protecting you. Listen to that voice.
Stop what you're doing and hear what that voice is telling you to do.
And then do it.
You can start by discussing these contradictions in IC and by finding a new IC if this one doesn't help you remove the defenses you have built.
*****
A further note on emasculation/unsexing:
I processed shame pretty quickly. With the first bout of shame, I verified that my anatomy was unchanged. I felt emasculated, but my parts were intact. They still seemed to function. I knew within minutes of my W's confession that I had definitely not been emasculated, no matter what I feared.
HB, of course, confirmed that
but I embarked on HB fully expecting to function well enough for my own pleasure.
If you feel unsexed, I recommend reaching down and checking your anatomy. If it's unchanged, the problem is in your mind. If it has changed, see a good MD.
I understand being turned off sex with your WS. That is common and sensible. I understand being turned of sex with anyone. That, too, is pretty common, and arguably sensible. But that's protecting oneself, and it's very different from being unsexed.
If d-day did not include surgery, your unsexing is almost definitely in your mind, just as it was in mine, and you control your own mind, whether you accept responsibility for that or not.
*****
Yeah, this is more 2 X 4s, and there are more where these came from, but I hope every reader understands that I wield them because I believe every recipient has what it takes to heal and to stop the 2 X 4s from hurting them.
You - WE - are all stronger than you/we think.
[This message edited by sisoon at 12:48 PM, January 23rd (Saturday)]