I mean the following as feedback on how I interpret your posts, and it's JMO. If you think it's psycho-babble, I urge you to read it as if it isn't, and see what your gut says.
I have done this repeatedly and I don’t know how much more clear I can be.
My understanding is that she's not doing what you want her to do, and I wonder if you've set requirements - real requirements: 'If you don't do this, we D.'
We went round and round in circles about issues like a written timeline, her seeing an IC, the fact that she never got tested for STD's, doing a polygraph, not being allowed to see the texts (that ship has really sailed; the phone was traded in), and the fact that I just don't believe I've been given the complete truth.
This makes me think you have not set requirements.
I read your posts to say that you're looking for universal truths. They may exist, but they're too vague to be useful. If you've been telling your W what you want based on 'science,' I can understand why you're stuck.
Recovering from being betrayed is specific to the individual. Your recovery is specific to you. Even if you and I use the same words (and we don't), we probably understand the words at least slightly differently.
If you want to R, you need to determine what you want in your new M, you need to ask for those things directly, you need to wait for a clear answer that sounds a lot like 'I will/won't do ____.' When you agree on your new M, you need to act to build it, you need to monitor performance, and you need to adjust as you go along.
But your own recovery needs to come first. You need to take responsibility for your own healing. You heal you. Your W heals herself. Together you heal/build/rebuild your M.
You know you're angry. You also probably feel grief, shame, and fear. You need to acknowledge all your feelings and thoughts (but especially feelings) about being betrayed, and you need to process them out of your body. You DON'T need anything from your W for this work, although her emotional support can be very helpful and positive for R.
Your W's work is work only she can do. I would have required IC, except that my W already was in C. But effective C is likely to be about what I think of as the self-talk that your W used to enable the A, not about helping you. Your W's recovery will benefit from your emotional support, and your emotional support is positive for R, but she has to do her work, which is to change from betrayer to good partner, to make R worth the effort, again IMO.
*****
You seem to want rules. Recovery requires you to write your own rules. R requires the partners to write their own rules.
In another thread you attempted to define certain basic requirements that a WS owed a BS if R is on the table. Many of those requirements did not apply to me or to many other BSes who have been active on Si over the years, and we're only a minuscule fraction of BSes.
You quote Proverbs 30:20. It doesn't apply to many WSes.
If there are rules, nothing actionable has been identified. You have to figure out effective actions based on your own specific sitch.
*****
There are, IMO, some - 5? 10? 20? - basic patterns in As, and within the patterns, I suspect there are myriads of variations. My bet is that there are enough variations to make it impossible to establish a single rule for R.
If you want to heal from being betrayed, my reco is minimize looking for patterns and focus on your own recovery.
If R is something you may want, my reco is to still minimize looking for patterns and instead focus on what your WS is doing to heal herself and on finding a fit between your desires for your new M and those of your WS.
If the fit isn't good enough, you can figure out how to deal with it - but first you have to accept the bad fit.
I'm sorry you're in pain Thumos. If you've asked for what you specifically want, and your W has not delivered, I'm very sorry. She has missed a chance to heal, and she's slowly alienated you. Alas, you're the only one who can get you out of pain.
[This message edited by sisoon at 1:08 PM, August 28th (Wednesday)]