I’ve gotten my pound of flesh but things don’t seem to be getting better when it comes to how I see her.
The reality, of course, is that you didn't get your pound of flesh. That's precisely the sticking point. Revenge rarely works. You hurt the other person, to be sure, but the dust settles and your pain is still there.
I see Buck, WWTL, and Thumos as sort of three sides of the same coin. In every case, y'all understand in your heart that you can no longer look at your WW with eyes of "in love with you". In every case, though, part of your decision is driven by a strange sort of twisted KISA impulse.
WWTL realized he could not treat his wife like an honorable husband should, so he did the right thing by her by leaving her.
Buck feels his WW will be lost if he leaves, so he stays with her, but the staying causes him to loathe her in a way that he cannot control. I think in his mind, though, his WW is better of with a husband who loathes her than as a divorcee with a scarlet A.
Thumos, you're waffling between those two. It's possible that the only thing stopping you from either course is your personal religious conviction, mixed with a genuine concern for your wife and family, because it's clear to me that your heart is in the place of D, like WWTL, and if you don't D, then craving an RA like Buck.
Here is a metaphor I've tossed around in my head from time to time. It's imperfect, but I thought I'd share. These mid-life crisis A's are so fraught. So many people to be hurt. So much sunk cost. The victims (the BS) also at the cusp between young and old, forced to contemplate a single life, with limited finances, at a time when happy retirement is becoming a visible horizon.
We talk here on SI about how the cheater always tries to characterize the A as a "mistake", when the reality is that the cheater normally makes a ton of decisions and choices to engage in the A, plotting and scheming carefully to maintain the secret and avoid detection. Imagine the perfect execution where a mid-life-crisis cheater pulls off a torrid PA without ever getting caught, satisfying the Jones, scratching the itch, then ending it and taking it to her grave. A tree falls in the forest and nobody hears and all that. I'd be willing to bet it happens a lot. In fact, I'd hazard it happens more with cheating wives than cheating husbands, because in a lot of cases men are self-absorbed and unobservant, women are smart and detail-oriented, meaning cheating husbands are more clumsy and likely to be caught, whereas betrayed husbands are less likely to notice the WW's cheating, especially if she is super-careful to hide her tracks.
But in the case of WWTL, Buck, and Thumos, the WW did get caught. Buck, forgive me because I forgot how you discovered your WW's A, but in the case of both Thumos and WWTL, the WW did in fact make a "mistake". The "mistake" wasn't the cheating, it was leaving a track uncovered in a manner that caught the BH's attention enough to lead him to investigate and uncover the truth. That is the "mistake".
Imagine that your WW starts secretly getting out of bed in the middle of the night and quietly amusing herself by holding a hot soldering iron near your junk. Closer and closer, her twisted sense of reality imagining what might happen if she actually burned you, taking secret joy in the power she has arrogated to herself, for herself, a weird sort of fulfillment. If she never burns you, and you never wake up, you'd never know. In the case of WWTL and Thumos, she slipped and burned your manhood with the iron. She made a "mistake". Afterwards, she's all tears and snot and "I'm sorry" and "what can I do to fix this," going full Stepford Wife and such.
But the reality is that your shit is burned and scarred, and will be for life, and she is the one who decided to engage in this wicked behavior because she felt a void in her soul and this was what she did to fill the void.
I don't really have any more. As I said, it's a partial idea, not wholly formed, but you get where I'm going. What do you do about your pain, and your legitimate anger about the person who carelessly caused it? I do mean "carelessly" -- that is, she knowingly engaged in behavior that could really hurt you, she chose that behavior because she wanted to do it more than she wanted to not cause the pain. "Care less". She had less care about your potential pain than she had about her desire to engage in the conduct. "Careless".
Out of the three of you, I see WWTL as the one who recognized the truth about himself and acted on that truth. "ILYBINILWY". He could not look at her with eyes of "in love" knowing that she is the kind of person who would make that sort of careless choice and, in so doing, hurt him in that way. Who can blame him? The hurt is irrevocable.
[This message edited by Butforthegrace at 8:42 AM, July 28th (Wednesday)]