My hero's are the people under the headset that took the initial emergency calls, the responders who put their lives on the line for others every day.
This is a tragedy for all the families involved. Just because someone is a sports star, does not make them heroes.
I think you captured it well. Honestly, I don't consider the first responders "heros" either. They choose a dangerous line of work, yes, I'm grateful to them for doing it, no doubt about it. But plenty of them are display horrible behavior too, I'm sure, because of their nature as humans. I'm sure plenty a first responder goes from the scene of an accident to a bar to drink too much and then into the arms of any willing woman. There's plenty of terrible behavior in their ranks too to go around.
There are very, very few "heros" in my world. There are people with amazing skills (sports, intelligence, etc), people with amazing resolve, people with amazing wealth, people with amazing fame.. And whatever they have, skill, resolve, etc, that's something to be idolized. He was incredibly skilled, there's no question, and from my understanding, he also had a very enviable work ethic. Those things are something to idolize, and to aspire to. But NOT the person, because the person, no matter how intelligent, how driven, is often deeply flawed. Don't idolize who they are, idolize the characteristics they display that you find important. People, all the time, do this tranferrence, "Oh, he's a very skilled player, he must be a great guy". We want it to be true, and, in a lot of ways, we let the image in our head become that of someone who has an impossible number of positive qualities. Perhaps that person exists, IDK, but he/she is wildly rare. Being good at sports, respectful on the field, or a "class act" in interviews means NOTHING about the actual person. If that's not abundantly clear from Tiger Woods, and that scandal blowing up, I'm not sure what could possible clarify it for most. But Tiger wasn't a "bad apple", he was just an "apple" in a cart that, for some reason, people said was the "good apples". Well, no, being great at golf doesn't make you a good person, in fact, if anything, it almost certainly reduces the likelihood your a good person if you're measuring "good" with "not cheating on your wife". Now, if you measure "good person" as "rich", "famous" and "great at sports"; sure, Kobe, Tiger, great people. But that's not my measuring stick for "good person".
Being skilled at something, especially uniquely skilled, does NOT mean those skills somehow grant you amazing talents in other areas of your life. If anything, those other areas suffer badly because they are ignored to hone your skill. I know wildly skilled people in my chosen profession, skill levels that are "world class". There's no knocking their ability to preform in the workplace, but, let me be the first to tell you, the higher their level of workplace performance, the less likely it is you want to be married to them. Great with numbers, no question, but "good people"? Not to the vast majority of us on this board, you would run the other way if you saw their married behavior on display.
And, just so you know, I put myself into that same grouping, I'm a terrible person measured on the whole. Might I be an inspiration to others about how I handled my W's A and my recovery. I suppose I could be. And maybe that is something you could look at (well, not really, but let's pretend) and say "Wow RIO, you really are amazing". You would be so wrong, I've done so many horrible things in my life, if anything, my handling of my W's A does a TINY bit to balance the scale back to "good person". But it's still strongly weighted in the other direction. I'll never do enough good to make up for the bad, and I didn't kill anyone, rape anyone, steal, or really do anything all "that bad" compared to what lots of others have done.