Disclaimer: This post is in no way meant to be a flame, slam, bash or offense to anyone. Please remember while reading this, that I am only stating my opinion based on what I have read on the last 4 pages of posts. I am a BS that does not have to deal with this situation, therefore please feel free to take what I am about to write with a grain of salt.
Infidelity That Begets an OC.
This is such a hard subject to contemplate, much less write about.
I couldn’t even begin to fathom the depths of a BS’s feelings in this situation. It is bad enough that our spouses have strayed from what we thought was a good M. But, to have fathered a child out of the union, whether planned, deceived or not, is one of the most hard to deal with consequences I can think of (aside from STD’s and aids of course). This means that, no matter what you would rather happen, you will most likely have the presence of the OW on the outskirts of your M for at maximum the next 18 years.
Most of the posts I have read, just from the last few days have been pretty emotional; most especially in regards to the OW. I do think it is completely unhealthy to yourself, and all involved, to keep OW bashing, when your FWS was just as culpable in the A. I know, I know, most of the whore calling is mostly to the OW while she is behaving badly after the A ended, but that doesn’t make it right. Anyway, I certainly don’t see this support thread as an OC bash, but I do have some concerns about what I have read.
I think that not being involved in a situation such as this gives me the ability to look at both sides, with an open mind, and better interpret what the actual intention of a post might have been. See, you BS’s that are going through this situation are dealing with it on an emotional level. Now, I am not saying that as if it is a bad thing, but when emotions are involved common/moral sense tends to take a bit of a back seat.
To me it appears that some of those, whom you have accused of flaming and bashing you for your opinions and statements in regard to OW/OC, were completely misconstrued. From what I have read, the comments seem mostly about the OC and the seeming lack of consideration or respect for their unasked for circumstances.
The one common theme that I have seen, just in the last 4 pages (‘cuz I couldn’t possibly read the entire thread, so many pages) is placing the entire blame for the OC on the OW. I do believe it takes two to tango, whether the OM was deceived into thinking the OW was on BC or not. Guess what, he still dipped his stick where it didn’t belong to begin with. It seems that once we decide to take our FWS back, we fully absolve them of any responsibility in the fallout from the A. I have read about WS offering to pay for the OW to abort the child they conceived. My question now would be how many of you BS’s would actually consider aborting a child? I could never even imagine being asked to do that to a child that was, moralistically right or not, conceived in what I believed was a loving relationship. I have strong feelings on the subject of abortion, so forgive me for stating my opinion. It is not intended to flame or offend anyone by any means.
So, yes the OW decided to have the child, be it for altruistic reasons or not this child still happens to be the seed of your FWS loins. Again, it still took two of them to make the child. Therefore, no matter the fact that you are moving forward with your M and wish the OC had never come into existence, the truth of the matter is, the child is there, and since the FWS had half the input to make it happen, he is truly responsible for a portion of OC welfare. It is an unconscious decision, to take the risk of a possible child, on the part of the FWS when entering into a sexual relationship. And, as we all know, abstinence is the only 100% effective method of birth control.
While it may be financially strapping to the family unit as it is now, it is still his responsibility to provide. When we, as BS’s decide that, even in the face of the upcoming birth of an OC, we want to remain in our M, we unconsciously agree to be his support for this situation. We unwittingly become a part of that equation. The FWS should be responsible; financially for sure and maybe emotionally, depending on his character.
It bothers me to think of the moral character (of lack there of) of a man, that has fathered a child, who either does not want to accept responsibility for his actions, requests the OW to have an abortion or would willingly give up his parental rights to said child. To me, this lack of moral character and fiber of being shows a flaw that just might lead him to stray again. Again, JMHO.
So, now that I have gone so completely all over the board on this one, I will get back to the main subject. While the OW might be a conniving, sneaky, poor excuse for a woman and mother in your eyes, your feelings for her should not overflow on to the OC. Believe it or not, he or she (the OC) really had no choice in the matter at all. Yes, as someone said, they are a victim as well as the BS and the marital children. They (the betrayed spouses and any children of either union), in my eyes anyway, are the victims in the whole scope of the A.
So, as much the BS’s here have complained about the amount of support their FWS have to pay to the OW, fair or not, if the situations were reversed and the FWS had left and gone to the OW, the same support would be expected, even more because of the fact that there was a marriage involved that was broken apart by the infidelity. Also, in some cases, not only is CS a given, but there is sometimes the awarding of Alimony (SS).
In closing, while the situation is unfair to you, as the BS and any marital children you may have as well as the OC, it is not just the OW who is at fault. She did have a little help getting that way. I have read the following statement, “I am not responsible for OC and will not let anyone put that responsibility on me” as well as others to the same effect. But in a way it is (joint accounts and bills and such), because you have opted to stay in your M, make it work and be a partner to your FWS. Unfortunately he is at least partially financially responsible.
Am I saying that the BS should allow the OC and OW be a part of the picture in their life from this point forward? That is not for me to say. That decision is solely up to the Husband and Wife. It is not up to the OW, or even the OC. Am I saying that the FWH has to feel that he should spend time with OC? No, that again is completely up to the FWH with the implicit agreement of the BW. However, I am saying that the FWH has an obligation, yes and obligation, to the child he fathered. Had he not been seeking sex, solace, companionship and the greener grass on the other side, the child would not have come about and you wouldn’t be in this situation, on this site or even in this thread.
[This message edited by CajunWoman at 3:40 PM, June 4th (Sunday)]