Hi anon789,
I see a lot in your thought processes that reminds me of myself. I sometimes think things through to the point where I reach what the business world calls 'analysis paralysis', which means coming up with so many angles, aspects, factors, and elements that I end up not knowing how to move forwards, and so I stay exactly where I am, doing nothing. Been there, seen it, done it. I am saying this gently, because I know what you are going through, but I have some questions I think you should consider before you become entirely stationary, and the situation becomes a case study rather than a real-time issue requiring action to change it:
What solid changes are you going to make to improve YOUR situation as a result of your wife's actions? It is clear that the current dynamic cannot continue, because it is not good for anyone involved, except the guy in New Zealand. And neither of us cares about his welfare, do we? I have put the word 'your' in capitals because you seem to be forgetting yourself and focusing on what may be 'wrong' with your wife. You are a doctor; healing others is a vocation, perhaps even an instinct. So I can see how you might default to forgetting about your own welfare and focusing on your wife and the various problems and maladies that you theorise she may have. Please, my friend, do not lose sight of yourself and your own welfare and mental and emotional well-being here. What I am saying here is not, "Physician, heal thyself", but, "Physician, protect yourself and prioritise your own needs and well-being when you are dealing with someone who puts their own needs ahead of yours and those of your children". If you don't protect yourself, and the children, from the potentially harmful actions of your wife, who will?
Are you in the process of transforming from man and wife to doctor and patient, or psychologist and client? From what you have written, it seems like a shift in your perception of the marital/relationship dynamic is happening, and that is not healthy for either of you. You are a healer, and that is a noble and wonderful thing, but your wife is primarily supposed to be exactly that; your wife. A position which carries with it a number of obligations and responsibilities to you. She is also a mother, which carries with it a set of obligations and responsibilities to her (and your) children. If you start to view your wife like a patient, or a victim, or a case study, are you giving her permission to renege on her obligations and responsibilities in life, and are you in danger of becoming an enabler by accepting her behaviour rather than challenging it?
When your wife flies back in, what will you have done to prevent the affair from continuing? She has not stopped it so far, and she even got on the plane after you told her you knew what she was doing. If she will not stop it, what will you do to stop it? You have already said that she has used your children's college fund to pay for her trips to New Zealand, so I would suggest you clip her wings financially for the foreseeable future. If she wants to fly to the other side of the world, let her get a job and pay for it herself, not make your children pay for it. Leaving aside what that says about her, you have to protect yourself and the kids by limiting her access to the family funds, or she will spend it all on herself. The psychology may be fascinating, but the consequences will be devastating if you continue to allow a selfish and irresponsible person access to the money that safeguards your children's future. It is abundantly clear that all your wife cares about is herself; stop worrying about her, and start making solid changes to protect yourself and your children from her dysfunctional, harmful behaviour.
It would be impossible to explain it all here, but I decided that the statement "I traveled to New Zealand because I was suicidal" is probably true.
So the man in New Zealand is a world-renowned psychiatrist who specialises in depression, and whose revolutionary technique is so successful that patients are prepared to sacrifice their family savings to fly in from all around the world for a course of treatment? I am not trying to be cruel or sarcastic in making that statement, I am trying to get to the root of why your wife, and by extension you (as you have chosen to believe her statement), believe this man in New Zealand has some kind of miraculous cure for suicidal tendencies? And if both of you do believe that, how many costly repeated courses of therapy are going to be necessary before your wife is cured?
Conversely, if the man in New Zealand is not a renowned psychiatrist with a proven track record of curing depression and suicidal thoughts, and turns out to be nothing more than an unprincipled turd who likes sticking it to married women, might it not be better to spend the children's college fund on visits to a real psychiatrist, much closer to home, whose treatment does not require the removal of his trousers? If the answer is yes, have you researched specialists and discussed your wife beginning treatment with them as soon as she
returns? If you believe your wife is suicidal or schizophrenic and depressive, she really needs to go straight from the airport to a psychiatrist's couch, or as soon thereafter as possible. She will not arrange this for herself, you will have to do it, but you can make her undergoing of treatment a condition of her return to the family home, because these New Zealand excursions have to stop now.
In general...my eventual decision...I would need to get into a deeper discussion with her at some point...
Can you see the inertia creeping into your thinking? That is what has allowed this situation to develop to the point that is has reached. Just as your wife has a lot of changes to make, I think it would be beneficial to you, and for you, to start thinking in terms of what you are going to do now to change things, rather than inventing a series of steps, caveats, and provisos that push any decision-making further and further away. I am so guilty of that myself, which is why I recognise it when I see it! My friend, we serve nobody's best interests when we prevaricate.
Your wife's repeated visits to New Zealand are not 'curing' her, they are draining your family's finances, and hurting you. So stop them, as of now, today, right this minute. If your wife was smoking crystal meth to escape her demons, would you fund it, and let her repeatedly go and see her dealer? No! Of course not. So why, when she asked if you wanted her to cancel her trip, did you not tell her to do that? She effectively said to you, "I'm going to see my crack dealer, unless you don't want me to go", and you let her go. Why? What possible benefit could either of you get from it?
I am not saying that to batter you, but because you are a decent, intelligent person who just needs to develop the confidence to assert yourself at times when a person or situation is getting out of hand. Standing back and allowing your wife's actions be governed by her irrational impulses or complexes is not doing her a favour; asserting yourself to prevent that from happening is not 'wrong', unreasonable, or tyrannical of you. Sometimes, that may take some 'tough love', particularly in the beginning. So please, as your wife has proven herself to be financially irresponsible, limit her funds, and tell her that if she so much as looks New Zealand up on a map, you are beginning divorce proceedings.
I think she is being passive aggressive because she wants to make me angry. If I become angry it would justify her continuing the A. I also think she is angry because she hates herself and transfers it to the kids and me. I'll say it again, the psychology here is fascinating. She simultaneously wants and does not want the kids. I'm really not completely sure if she has multiple personalities or is just messing around.
As I said earlier, is she your wife, or your patient? Does understanding a behaviour make its consequences any more acceptable or tolerable within the marriage? At what point do you cease to observe and take a more proactive role to challenge negative, destructive behaviour, and remove the factors that enable it (such as access to the children's college fund, or permission to fly to New Zealand)?
I am not saying this as a criticism, but have you asked yourself why you let the situation develop to this point? That is not in any way an excuse or justification for your wife's unacceptable behaviour. She is responsible for that, but what, in your thinking, prevented you from stepping in earlier and saying, "No. Stop. Enough."? You found a heap of evidence of travel to New Zealand, but observed rather than taking action.
I say that not as a criticism, but in the hope that you can review the way this situation began and grew, and identify points at which taking decisive action and challenging lies and negative behaviour could have halted the growth of the negative dynamic that currently exists. And by identifying those key points, I hope that you can learn to recognise when they start to happen in future, and when challenging and neutralising them is the right and appropriate thing to do. To become proactive, rather than reactive. It isn't easy, it is something I struggle with myself, but once we become aware of that tendency, we can take steps to combat it, and to spur ourselves into action.
Which brings me to my final point, which is that while your wife is still away, you should make a list of actions that you will take as soon as she returns. No prevaricating, no "I might at some point..", no, "There would have to be discussions before...". These are things that need to be done now.
1) A complete review of the family funds, and actions taken to curb your wife's unlimited access to them.
2) Your wife immediately enters treatment for suicidal depression and possible schizophrenia. She is the one who identified herself as suicidal, so she has no grounds to object to treatment for it.
3) A total and utter ban on any further trips to New Zealand, and close scrutiny on future travel plans in case the OM has plans to fly to the US.
4) You have already contacted a lawyer, and it has been suggested that you find a more aggressive one. Why not consult another, or even a couple more? When you reach a consensus of opinion from them about what your position is, go with the most aggressive one and have divorce papers drawn up. Show them to your wife, and explain to her that she has crossed a line, and that any further contact with the OM will result in the initiation of divorce. No ifs or buts, no qualifications, no woolly dithering. Being 'understanding' may end up being enabling, and that is not in anyone's best interests.