** posting as a member **
I tried to refrain from posting again on this thread. I really did, but this blows my mind:
The facts are very few people do actually change. How many criminals are repeat offenders? From some things I've read 68% re-offend within 3 years and 77% after 5 years.
That's a ridiculous analogy.
If you do financial analysis the same way you've gone about reconciliation after infidelity statistics ... but I'm sure you don't.
You are continuing to let your emotions rule your posting.
Take a look at Help for Therapists (and Their Clients), downloadable for free at dearpeggy.com (citation approved by mods). And somewhere in NOT "just Friends", Glass says, in essence, that 80% of the couples she treated who said they want to R actually did R.
There's no point in polling SI members, since we come and go. Besides, you seem to have taken on the role of M judge, so you can continue to skew responses any way you want to.
There are no definitive infidelity statistics that can be extrapolated to general populations. The best we have is probably the General Social Survey, which is interview-based. It depends on people admitting that they cheated ... and admissions and denials are taken at face value, so who knows how many people lied to the interviewer?
Believe me, the sooner you stop hoping that statistics and over-generalizations will heal you, the sooner you’ll heal.
I feel R is possible with a remorseful spouse and a BS who is willing to give the gift of trying to R and both spouses are trying to create a new marriage.
Reconciliation, by definition, cannot be made with an unremorseful spouse or the spouses not working together. A marriage is made of two people.
On the other hand, if the WS is not remorseful, and is not working fully toward R and is still cheating, reconciliation is not occurring.
I feel R is possible with a remorseful spouse and a BS who is willing to give the gift of trying to R and both spouses are trying to create a new marriage.
Reconciliation, by definition, cannot be made with an unremorseful spouse or the spouses not working together. A marriage is made of two people.
On the other hand, if the WS is not remorseful, and is not working fully toward R and is still cheating, reconciliation is not occurring.
You've generalized, but your generalizations both make sense and have a lot of anecdotal evidence to back them up.
Statistical arguments, however, fly in the face of accepted statistical science, since no infidelity statistics meet the accepted standards of the field of statistics.
I personally reframe the guideline from 'generalization' to 'over-generalization'. I class statistical arguments (and any use of 'all', none', 'most', 'very few', etc. is included) as over-generalizations and violations of the SI guideline.
I know the pain of being betrayed. I know the desire to lash out too well.
And I would bet everything I own and everything I can borrow that focusing on healing one's own pain is at least one part of the fastest and cleanest way out of infidelity.
IDK ... now that I reread this for the umpteenth time, I fear this can be seen as lashing out. My argument is with your idea, skins, not with you.
You have apparently made a decision to split. Believe me, I trust your judgment on this, and you have my full support for your decision.
Just don't give me any statistical argument to support it.
[This message edited by sisoon at 12:18 PM, March 22nd (Thursday)]