Th' expense of spirit in a waste of shame
Is lust in action; and till action, lust
Is perjured, murd'rous, bloody, full of blame,
Savage, extreme, rude, cruel, not to trust,
Enjoyed no sooner but despisèd straight,
Past reason hunted; and, no sooner had
Past reason hated as a swallowed bait
On purpose laid to make the taker mad;
Mad in pursuit and in possession so,
Had, having, and in quest to have, extreme;
A bliss in proof and proved, a very woe;
Before, a joy proposed; behind, a dream.
All this the world well knows; yet none knows well
To shun the heaven that leads men to this hell.
Sonnet 129, WS
You’re not the only one Chamomile, thanks for saying it. I’m finding it difficult to understand some of the hyperbole of this thread. I note with interest that it seems that it is OW who seems to have initiated the trysts, at least the ones so far reported. Far from the being sociopathic as has been suggested, I suggest she has in fact a strong sense of others’ feelings, but wanted to be Mrs SB, or at least wanted to wound or destroy a good marriage, so either suppressed her sympathies for Speedbump, or in fact in her jealousy rather relished the taking of something that belonged to SB, thereby being very cognisant of her feelings.
None of which excuses Mr SB, of course, whether he was led up the garden path or not. The nickname TBB presumably coined by him is also very telling - and much depends on the kind of badmouthing of Speedbump by him in his texts, the detail of which we don’t have. Weirdly, it would be that, that level of disrespect behind my back that would finish me off (rather than two thrill-seeking adolescents rutting pathetically in my kitchen thinking they’re so ‘cool’) but sadly also that is not unusual either, it’s part of the transactional currency of an A often.
Sadly, as Frank Pittman and Shirley Glass have both noted, infidelity happens in good and happy marriages. What may have happened here is that by coincidence of timing a manipulative OW has tapped into and fuelled underlying but probably minor resentments Mr SB had, & also seems to have recognised and appealed to his KISA and fixing instincts, and so it all turned into a puerile and ultimately vindictive and escalating highly adolescent - & childish - lust game, with TBB cast as parent. More vapid and banal rebellion rather than sinister ‘Marnie’ scenario. My feeling is that he was more stupid and weak (and good at compartmentalising) than motivated purely by vindictive resentment, (but that depends on the level and extent of badmouthing In the texts), but it seems there was a level of malevolence in OWs purpose (I feel).
Just of course speculation on my part so hopefully people can disagree with me respectfully and not turn their ire on me, It’s a broad church of opinion on this thread, and members’ tolerance of others’ opinions, rather than the angry mob rule (often a projection of people’s personal feelings and situations) that sometimes pertains in JFO, is the best way for a newly betrayed person to gain the variety of perspectives that can help them ascertain their own. Being shouted down does not encourage those with alternative viewpoints to post.
If as it sounds that he has done a full and comprehensive timeline, without the usual minimising and trickle truth, then that is to his credit, and the madness described by Shakespeare above, now broken and loathed by him also. It would be helpful to know if in any of the discussions with SB or in the timeline what kind of awareness or self knowledge he is evincing - or not.
I don’t like to suggest one way or another, but nevertheless 😊 I do feel the need to say that if it were me, I would be looking very hard at the marriage and what was good and bad in it - if there was much good, I would be looking at that very closely and not immediately or automatically allow OW/ would-be Mrs SB to succeed in her mission to scorch it to the ground (she was presumably jealous because it WAS a good marriage, and so she decided to promote herself from position of third stool and thereby relegate SB to that position). I am wondering how well SB actually knew her WH, the difficulties and misunderstandings around feelings about his first wife seem to suggest the comfiness SB describes in her relationship did not allow for much digging or full open-ness (that not a criticism, just speculation again).
[This message edited by Edie at 2:23 AM, February 20th (Wednesday)]