Trying to get them to see the overwhelming hurt and trauma to the BH in either point is like trying to get a brick wall to understand how to solve partial differential equations. It just ain't gonna happen.
As a contributor to most of these threads that pop up, as much as I hate to say it, I have to agree, it's a hugely uphill battle to get people to see this issue differently. Speaking personally, I see what the other point of view is, and I understand the points they make, it's just that those points don't resonate at all and also feel like a great way to keep the "sexual plan A" (the AP) in that special place rather than the BS.
You know, a big part of me thinks, "Is this really so hard"? Like, if I'd been the cheater and gave my AP all kinds of crazy sex, would I really be on here defending my right to not do any of that with my W (assuming she wanted/asked for it)? I suppose perhaps I might be, but.. And this is going to be really hard to say, I'm pretty sure if I were here arguing that point (I went down on the AP and made her orgasm each time, my wife wanted that before the A, and still wants it today, and I won't do it for her) it would point to a different issue. And that issue is the crux of the problem; if that were the situation (my hypothetical) the only real reason I can imagine I'd do that is because I found the AP more attractive/cleaner/tasted better/etc than I do my W. And that's the simple and totally unacceptable truth as to why I'd act like that coming out of an A. The more attracted I am to you, the more you'll get from me. And that's a universal truth in my life that I've seen play out on both sides (for men and women). Men will let a woman they find unattractive give them a BJ, but will only go down on a woman they are really attracted to (at least some men, myself included). And a WW saying "you can have sex with me, but nothing other than missionary" (when she worked through every porn position possible with the AP) is exactly the same thing.
Nobody should think their be-all and end-all worth is directly tied to their sex life.
Be all, end all? No, that should not be your sex life. But is it a big component for some people? Yes, it is. Just making numbers up, but some large percentage of my daily happiness relates to my sexuality. Had a crappy day at work but had sex 4 times? Well.. That's still going to be a "good day" because of the weighting that sex gets for me. Almost any day can be "made good" with sex, and even a great day can be ruined without it (NOT all great days, I'm not saying that at all, but I had lots of "great days" where my wife turned me down for sex as we laid in bed together that totally erased all the good memories of the day and made me feel like a used tool, make her happy with a romantic day together and she didn't spend any effort at all to make me happy with her; day ruined, no matter how good it was).
Your comments I agree with, UNTIL the time comes that she cheats. That's a whole different ballgame.
I just found this nugget and needed to edit to include it. That's an incredibly important point; I wasn't happy with our "pre-A sex life" but I accepted it. I knew what I'd signed up for when I got married and I carried that burden as part of the "job" of being married. No, it wasn't great, and yes, there were a lot of "nos" that seemed unreasonable to me, but I made that deal. I could try to change hearts and minds, but that was entirely optional and would be icing on the marriage cake, not a "must have". That all goes out the window though after an A, especially a porn star sex A (which is more common than not).
And now, knowing what I know now, as much as it probably will annoy/upset some posters, if I were to D and date someone new, I'd never accept it in any relationship. It's going to be great or I'm out. Because, if anything, the A showed me something I used to know but convinced myself wasn't true in the most painful and damaging way possible. "No, I don't do that" doesn't mean "I don't do that", it means "I don't do that with you". And that statement is just unacceptable, either in R or in a new relationship.
[This message edited by Rideitout at 9:11 AM, March 17th (Sunday)]