The way I am starting to see it is that the alcohol is just her way of shifting responsibility from herself. Making her believe that the drinking problem is what makes her a bad person when it is the other way around. There is clearly something deeper than the booze that is driving these decisions.
She is justifying her behavior by blaming alcohol. Without the alcohol she has no excuse, as poor of an excuse as it is. Without that she realizes that she is just a bad person who drinks in a poor attempt to clear her own conscience of whatever selfish urge she acts on. If that's the case she has no right to be in a relationship with anyone,certainly not me.
Those are very perceptive comments.
I have a friend who knows that he gets mean when he drinks whisky. So he does not drink whisky.
I have a friend who says, "I act like a lunatic when I drink cider". So he does not drink cider.
Your wife has known that she acts inappropriately with other men when she is drunk. She has had wake-up calls in the past, like kissing a co-worker. She continues to drink.
The point is that if a person does not like the way drink or drugs affects their behaviour, they avoid them.
If a person knows, and continues to use drink or drugs, then they are not averse to the effects of those substances, or the way they act when under their influence.
If there had been a single incident, it could be considered as a chicken and egg situation. Does your wife act inappropriately with other men because she is drunk, or does she get drunk to enable her to act inappropriately with other men?
However, there have been several incidents where your wife has acted inappropriately with other men while drunk, so there is no mystery to be solved. Alcohol is deliberately being used as both an enabler and an excuse.
And whatever has been said about her actions with her affair partner, you only have her word to go on about how drunk she was when she cheated.
The other issue is that unless your wife is a functional alcoholic, who is partially drunk 24/7, 365 days a year, then she was sober when she texted her affair partner for weeks, and sober when she decided to drop out of going to the event with you, and go out with him instead.
So whether she was drunk by the time she went home with him or stone cold sober is irrelevant, because she knew what the intended outcome was going to be the second she left the house.
She was either thinking, "I am going home with X tonight", or, "I am going to get hammered and go home with X tonight".
What you have grasped is that being hammered is the way she establishes an excuse to justify actions that she is fine with, but knows she should not be doing.
If she was not comfortable with going out and getting black-out drunk, why would she keep doing it? I do not like dropping housebricks on my foot, so I am careful when I carry housebricks while wearing sandals.
If you knew that every time you put a rucksack over your head and go for a drive you end up driving your car into a tree, how often could you do that and use, "But I had a rucksack on my head" as an excuse for plowing your car into yet another tree?
Any sentient listener would respond, "You have enough experience to know what happens when you do that".
If you had to describe the dynamic that exists between you and your wife, what would it be?
The sensible one and the crazy one?
Parent and child?
The introvert and the extrovert?
Teacher and pupil?
Leader and follower?
There are loads more combinations that could be thrown into the arena, but the point is that acceptance of your wife's actions when she is drunk creates a dynamic between you that leaves you as the fall guy.
I know you must see this now, but the first time your wife went out, got sh*tfaced, and vanished, should also have been the last. It was a signal that she needed to develop better self-control.
Unless your wife changes, there will be repeat performances of her cheating. Unless you change your attitude to her actions, she will not change them.
You are in no way, shape, or form to blame for your wife's conscious, sober decision to cheat. However, you are responsible for the decision about whether or not you are going to continue enabling her actions by not setting firm boundaries in your relationship with her.
You cannot control your wife; you can only control yourself. Your wife may want to be a drunk party girl for the rest of her life. You cannot control that. What you can control is how long you remain married to her if she wants to pursue that lifestyle.
Recent events dictate that you either cut your losses and go now, or define your boundaries and what you will (and will not) tolerate, and stay or go depending on how your wife responds to your boundaries.
There must be no more tolerance for boozy disappearances, because that will lead to more trouble.
[This message edited by M1965 at 6:30 PM, September 17th (Tuesday)]