Listen: someone wants more money. Does that excuse, justify their robbing a bank and murdering someone in the process? Of course not, and nobody would suggest that.
Exactly. And the number of immensely rich people who rob banks is a number that either is, or is close enough to 0 that we just call it 0. We don't go any easier on people who kick in the door of a bank for money and wind up murdering someone than we do people who just wake up and murder someone for "no reason", but we also understand the bank robbers motivation much better than we understand the guy who wakes up, kills his family, and then goes off to work like nothing happened. Same crime, same punishment, very different levels of "understanding" as to why it happened and what motivated that individual to kill.
Correlation Doesn’t Imply Causation. That's a very important thing for people to understand. I should clarify, cheating is not caused by lack of sex/WOA/acts of service or any other love language being spoken poorly. But I'd bet my life that there's a significant correlation there. Correlation doesn't mean "all", there were a few posts after yours where people illustrated exactly that, there are people who really just do it for "no reason", the guy who wakes up, kills a few people, and then goes off to work, no provocation, no "reason", just does it. And there are men who cheat who are having sex 3X a day with their wives. And wives who cheat who have husbands who shower them with praise, gifts and love. There are people who cheat "just for the thrill of it". But I don't think we're having an intellectually honest discussion if we don't examine the more common reasons for cheating, or the more common factors in a M that "leads" someone to cheat, much as the lack of money "leads" someone to rob a bank.
I look at the posters who did everything and were "perfect spouses" with a measure of both jealousy and also, if I'm honest, skepticism. I'm jealous because I wish I could say that about myself, I wish I could look back on my M and say "You were a model spouse, she had no reason to look elsewhere". I can't; frankly, not hardly. I wasn't a model spouse. I'm still not, perhaps worse in some ways, because now I carry around tons of baggage, hurt and pain from what happened. But I KNOW I could have done more. I sucked at speaking her love language. Sucked badly, if I'm honest with myself, I was pulling up the rear in that particular aspect of the M. Now, this in NO WAY justifies what she did, but it does help explain what she did. It gives me some insight into why she was so weak for those words from another man, and why his bullshit was so effective on her. I honestly am not sure what I'd do if I felt like I was "as good as I could be" at speaking her LL and was still cheated on, that would be, in some ways, more hurtful because what do I do now? I was speaking her LL as hard as I could and she still cheated?
Yes, I have no doubt there are people who "give it their all" in the way their spouse wants/needs and still fail. But that wasn't me, and, if I look around at other cheaters I know, I don't think it was them either. It sounds like there are some people in this thread who have that situation, and, in many ways, I'd love to feel that way just to help me sleep at night. You did everything you could RIO, she's just a f**k up. Well, she may be a f**k up, no argument there, but the first part; I'd argue that until I'm blue in the face because I know I didn't do everything I could. I did more than most, and that SHOULD have been enough. I can totally get on board with that. But I could have done better. I ran a 6 minute mile, pretty good, but I was capable of a 5 minute mile, in fact, I'd run a 5 minute mile for other people in the past (showering them with praise and words to get them into bed).
The problem with putting the blame at the door of the spouse for not ‘treasuring’ their wayward enough is IMHO it prevents the CS from truly doing the work because they have a convenient get out clause and their BS is offering that to them on a plate.
I agree with this, and I think that's why people react so strongly to it. It's a very dangerous and slippery slope, and it's a very convenient "get out of WS hell" card. But it's also impossible, IMHO, not to examine the "role" the M had in an A and accurately describe the reasons for an A. The "role" of the M in the A could be "none". Your cheater could be the guy who wakes up and just goes on a killing spree, no provocation, reason, or motivation necessary. And I do believe I know people like this, the guys rushing the teller who already have millions in the bank just for the "rush". The money in the vault pales in comparison to the money they already have at home, and they still do it. But this cheater isn't what I typically see; it's far more the "down and out bum, nothing to lose" who's using a fake gun to try to hold up a neighborhood bodega. And yes, in these cases, it's almost always sex, it's the guy who opines to me over a drink that the last time he saw his wife naked was last year or the guy who doesn't think the "Bride smiling because that's the last time she'll ever give a BJ" isn't funny in the least because that's become his life. The wife's fault? Of course not, and who knows, all of these stories could be make believe and justifications, nobody will ever know by that guy and his wife. But that "rings true" to me, much like the bum holding up the bodega, it "makes sense". You have no money, you want money, the cash register has money, therefore.. Same punishment, that's not at all what I'm saying, same crime. Same pain for the bodega employee who had a gun in his face. One is NOT better than the other. But one is far more understandable, if Jeff Bezos gets caught today robbing a bank, I think most of us will spend a lot of time thinking "WTF", where when our local newspaper reports on another convenience store robbery by your local thugs, most of us will think "other day in paradise".
My wife was not Jeff Bezos. She was desperate for something that I wasn't providing to her. There's a multitude of reasons for this, but, suffice to say, I'm convinced that's what she was after in the A, and, if I'd given it to her, I'm pretty certain the A wouldn't have happened. I may be wrong, that I freely admit. But I don't want to be wrong; I want to "do better" in my M, have her do the same and wind up with both of us happier. Because if that's not the end goal of all this, well.. I'm wasting my and her time.