JMO coming ...
People here hate the hard line but it works. Stand up for yourself, stand up for yourself.
I'm surprised you say that, since many of us say, in essence, that the best way out of infidelity is to stand up for yourself - figure out what you want, 2) figure out if it's accessible and 3) go for it.
That does NOT mean 'threaten.' Threats don't work. Bluffs are dishonest and bad for the BS, even if a bluff succeeds.
It means figure out what you want and go for it - in your way, on your timeline, using your strategy.
Threats and bluffs see recovering from infidelity in a competitive framework - but recovery isn't competitive. Your recovery is essentially totally in the individual's hands. A WS can help or hinder a BS, but the BS controls his own recovery, irrespective of what the WS does.
The WS becomes relevant if the BS wants to consider R or if the BS wants R. But the most important tasks for the BS are 1) to process the anger, grief, fear, and shame out of his body and 2) to figure out what he wants.
R(ecovery) isn't BS -OR- WS. It's BS -AND- WS - separately. Individually. On their own paths.
Both partners have to stand up for themselves for R(econciliation) to work well.
Attractiveness makes a big difference for me, frame of mind is important, lead up to the sex matters..
Research indicates that attractiveness for college students is crucial, until the students get to know each other. Then personality an shared interests, experiences, and values become more important in choosing dates.
If it were the case (that the sex was better with OM), I would want to know that from my WW. Yes, I might D because of it…. This is the kind of thing that gives people like me immense fear.
Wow. So the least competition gets you to leave the field? You compete(d) for new women, who had no one knows who many partners, but you won't for your WW, whose number you know?
That doesn't make sense. And while logic alone won't get you through recovery, d-day and its aftermath for years, recovery goes better when one's logic is sound....
My W was honest - she said she found the first few sexual sessions beyond description. That's 4, RIO, who admit the sex was special. (Admittedly, though, the sex she had made her an outlier, and I certainly could not have competed even if I wanted to.) After that, she says, it morphed into a chore - and she states explicitly she was in it for the kibbles and the 'rewards' that accrue to KISAs.
But honesty was especially important to us - The sex would - not could - have meant D, if my W were gay. But D wouldn't have been punishment; rather it would have freed both of us to be true to ourselves - to stand up for ourselves.
BTW, it's clear that some - NOT ALL - people choose D because they are afraid to stay on the field and work to R.
It's not a competition unless you make it one. If you frame your recovery as going for the best possible outcome for yourself - that is, going for what you want, within the constraint of what is possible - you stop yourself from competing with the aps.
Then, if R doesn't succeed, it's not because of any failing in the BS. Rather, it's due to a failing in the WS or a bad fit between fBS and fWS.
Sex between two such people is gross and repulsive because both people are gross and repulsive during the affair. If you do not see sex with your AP in these terms then you do not understand remorse.
It may be hard to accept, but aps are people. Our WSes are probably aps. They don't handle feelings well and they weren't thinking well around their As, but ... the brilliant and apparently charismatic Steven Hawking was a WS.
Above all, WSes are eminently redeemable, if they are willing to do the work.
And honesty is required for redemption.
IMO, logic dictates accepting what a person says, unless there are specific reasons to doubt that specific person or claim. if a WS says the sex was blah, I'll accept it, unless there are specific reasons to doubt that specific WS.
I want honesty from my W. If she pretends or just lies about the good sex, if it was good, that's when I'll have a problem with her.
Along with what DF says, I'm grateful for the food I have now. It doesn't make me want one of the great meals I've had in the past. There's more to a great M than sex.
[This message edited by sisoon at 3:13 PM, October 2nd (Wednesday)]