Hi GoQuiet,
The problem with these drunken episodes is that in almost all of them, the person who did the drunken cheating cannot recall a lot of the most important key moments and exchanges where they could have said no or stopped it.
The betrayed person is always left wondering if the memory loss is real, or convenient.
What is troubling here is that your wife says that her friends confirmed that she was drunk, but not black-out drunk at the point that she got out of the cab.
Then she and this guy who may or may not have been a lot less drunk went to another bar, and by the time she left, she was a lot more drunk, or her drink had been spiked.
Beyond a couple of fragmentary memories from her, the next thing she remembers is waking up in bed next to the guy, naked.
That is why this statement does not add up:
Though she understands that the situation could be interpreted as rape, she's taken responsibility and stated that even though she doesn't remember anything, from the grey recollection she has she can only assume she consented by 'going along with it' in her blackout state. She doesn't recall any of the thoughts she had at the time, and doesn't remember entering the house, that image is the last thing she has any memory of.
If she does not remember saying 'yes', maybe she did not say it. So why is she taking full responsibility when if what she says is true, she had no idea what she was doing, and if she was as drunk as she says she was, she was in no fit state to give consent, even if she did?
Then there is this:
My gf remembers none of this, but having had the horrific deal of receiving a phone call from this guy – he stated that they drunkenly walked back to the apartment and at the porch of the house they kissed - no idea who initiated, before going up to my gf's room where they had sex. He evidently remembered what happened throughout, but speaking directly to him following what happened I really didn't need to hear the details.
Who initiated that phone call, and how did that guy get your number? It seems very strange that he would decide to call you up and tell you his version of events without any prompting from anyone else.
And if he was sober enough to recall everything in detail, and your GF was genuinely so drunk that she had no idea what she was doing, then he was a sober or mildly drunk guy who had sex with a woman he barely knew who was too drunk to give consent. Which is, effectively, rape.
And yet your GF is certain that it was not rape, as if she does recall giving consent and going along with it, but does not want to admit doing that.
Did she ask the guy to call you up? If so, was he delivering a cover story for her, at her request, or for himself, so he did not end up in court?
I apologise if it seems I am laboring the details, but they are very important when it comes to the issue of consent and how drunk both of them were.
However, as you then said this...
Therefore I'm of the stance that what happens to an individual in this state becomes a lot more situational than conscious. The individual is of course responsible for not getting in to this state, but shit happens in new scenarios and people end up consuming more than intended. I think if something happens when in this state, but there hasn't been a build up of suspect behaviour prior when less drunk, it more highlights an issue with associated with extreme alcohol consumption then the true nature of an individual.
...it looks like your view of it is that she basically got drunk, had a consensual one night stand, woke up, and regretted it.
Sadly, stuff like that does happen, even with random strangers.
In this case though, the ONS partner was a guy that your wife knew from work, and had built up enough of a rapport with to be comfortable doing a house-share with him. And to go drinking with him.
And he felt comfortable enough with her to push his luck and go to bed with her.
Perhaps the guy is a drink-spiking sexual predator, or an unprincipled scumbag who equates a woman being too drunk to say 'no' with full consent, but your GF's certainty that it was not rape suggests that there was more to it.
The element that you have not really covered, and possibly not looked into, is what kind of relationship your GF had built up with the guy in the time leading up to the incident.
If she had discussed being housemates with him, they clearly knew each other, and liked each other enough to consider living in close proximity (which is of course not proof of any romantic interest).
So what exactly was the nature of their relationship that led to the point that it culminated in a one night stand that your GF insists was consensual on her part, but which she regretted the morning after?
Before anyone thinks I am blaming a woman who was too drunk to say no for 'bringing it on herself', that is not my point at all.
I guess what I am questioning is why she believes that her consent was somehow implied.
Is she basing that on just the interactions of a couple of hours that night, or on the dynamic that had developed between her and her potential housemate beforehand?
Why did she take full responsibility rather than saying she was taken advantage of?
Yes, she may have been trashed when it happened, but I get the feeling that it may have been an accident that was waiting to happen, and had perhaps been building for a while before it happened.
Of course, that does not excuse the guy who was sober enough to remember it all pushing it to that stage when the GF was too smashed to know what she was doing, even if she liked the guy.
That element of a pre-existing connection or relationship might explain why the guy involved felt obliged to call GoQuiet and provide his account of the incident. If there was no relationship, why would he bother doing that?
Or was he simply a predator, presenting a tale of a woman who was only too happy to hit the hay with him, rather than admitting that he steered a drunk woman to her room, helped her out of her clothes, and then did what he did while she thought she must have consented?
To me, I get the feeling of a friendship that crossed boundaries to become something else, and ended up in bed after a night of drinking, quite possibly with the woman being too drunk to know what she was doing.
I think the biggest 'tell' is that after she sobered up, she was not happy with what happened. It suggests that if she had been sober the night before, it would not have happened.
The big question, of course, is whether or not to take things forward, or call it a day.
GoQuiet, the fact that you have come this forum, and not simply dropped your GF, suggests that you would like to see if things can work between you and your GF.
That being the case, I think you should wait until you and your GF can spend prolonged time together, which it seems like you have not been able to do for the five years that you have been together.
Be honest: how well do you really know each other?
The issue being discussed is your GF's involvement with another man, whatever its nature was, and the one night stand that it led to.
However, the real issue is whether or not you are truly suited to one another, and whether you will really gel as a couple when you can live together, in the same home, for a prolonged period.
No-one can answer that. You will only know by trying it.
That begs the question, "Should I try it, after what she did?"
The fact that you have not already made the decision indicates that you want to try it, so maybe you should, because that is how you feel.
Can anyone give you a guarantee that if you try it, nothing will go wrong, and there will be no repeat performances? No.
The truth is that every relationship is a gamble. Nobody gets married thinking they have not picked a winner. Not one person in this forum knew about it on their wedding day. That knowledge came later.
Your GF's one night stand might be an event that leads to a lifetime of casual drunken sex, or it could be a disaster from which she learns a lesson, and which she never repeats. Only time will tell on that score.
When you get to spend some time together, it would be worth getting her to explain why, after her actions, she wants to continue the relationship with you, and where she thinks it is going.
If the one night stand was a deal-breaker for you, you would be gone. As you are sticking around, why not treat it as a warning, and watch closely to see what lessons your GF has learnt from it?
If, long-term, she does not make you feel secure, or you find that you really do not - or cannot - have strong feelings for her any more, then the best thing is to part and both of you look for other people to start afresh with.
While it is healthy that you have reached a point mentally and emotionally where you know you will be fine if you end things with your GF, it raises the question of how much point there is to stay with someone that you would be fine parting with tomorrow?
It is not so much "Will she cheat again?" as "Will you ever feel safe loving and trusting her again?"
Only you can answer that.
If the answer is no, let her go.
She might have learnt a lesson from what she did, and transform into the best and most faithful life-partner in history, but if you do not feel comfortable with her, that will count for nothing.
If you think you will live every day prepared to let her go, and so emotionally detached that you will shrug that off, then let her go now, because you will never make each other happy.
Both of you deserve more than that.
[This message edited by M1965 at 5:46 PM, June 25th (Thursday)]