This is only the first half of the letter I sent to the court and her lawyer
Chronology
1994: Petitioner and respondent met
1997: Respondent moved in to petitioner’s property.
2004: Married
2005: Son born
2007: Second son born
2011: Petitioner diagnosed with work related anxiety and mild depression
2012: May and June. Petitioner signed off work due to work stress.
2012: July. Petitioner returns to work.
Oct 2012 Relationship begins with line manager.
21/12/12 Adultery committed.
10/02/13 Adultery exposed by petitioner and admitted by respondent.
Respondent declared another affair with colleague in 2002 (POS I didn't even know about)
Summary
The credibility of the respondent must be doubted when a review of all the legal correspondence (already a matter of court record) is made. Numerous examples of exaggeration and untruth are evident. I also attach copies of legal correspondence regarding financial negotiation, or lack thereof.
In late December 2012 both parties committed to an expenditure of £3000 for a foreign holiday in August 2013. This would suggest that the respondent had no intention of leaving the marriage until the adultery was exposed by the petitioner.
The respondent provided an email justification of her betrayal to the petitioner on the 6th May 2013 explaining all of the reasons for the affair. This was an opportunity for her to cite all of the unreasonable behaviour to which she accuses the petitioner of. Upon reading, this would suggest that there were no serious transgressions during the marriage else they would have been included in the message. Essentially and tacitly, the e-mail states that there was no abuse or violence. The pertinent paragraph is provided:
“In answer to one of your texts asking why I am doing this - for the chance of happiness. Our 'perfect family unit' worked for you but it didn't work for me. Yes, the boys had familiarity from our foursome but we could have, and should have done so much more. Life revolved around the TV for everyone and we got lost in material obsession. I wanted to make you happy and agreed to most things you wanted to do or to buy, at the expense of my own wishes, and what we should have been doing with the boys. I never felt totally relaxed when we were all at home, whereas now, I do. You think I am doing this for selfish reasons but I am doing it for the boys as well. Whatever the reasons for it, you are doing things with them that a father should with his sons. I don't expect you to agree or see my side.”
The respondent had never voiced unhappiness in the marriage to the petitioner or her friends or family members. The respondent has brought a few minor examples of marital argument over a 19 year period to the fore in order to justify her adultery and hence the claim she should not pay costs. The petitioner was blindsided when the adultery was exposed. The affair has skewed her perception of the marriage and is choosing to see it as having been flawed all along—an attempt to reduce cognitive dissonance.
The petitioner experienced several months of work related depression and anxiety in the first half of 2012. The respondent expressed “resentment” that the petitioner should be off work and able to drop off and collect the children from school during that time. This has since been cited as another reason to leave the marriage.
In August 2012 the family took an extended vacation to France where both parties expressed a renewed sense of family unity and love for each other. This was a very intimate time for both parties, both physically and emotionally, and reflected a new beginning after mental health issues were resolved. The brief period of depression provided a sense of entitlement for the respondent and she took solace with her line manager to provide the strength and masculinity that was lacking from the petitioner during these months. Her vows were no longer relevant.
I attach 3 email examples sent by the respondent over the past two years of simple expressions of affection and love further demonstrating that the respondent was not in a difficult marriage. The third email was received in late August 2012, just two months before her relationship began with her affair partner.