yeah Rideitout, I am on JFO 98% of the time so I haven't seen you much but I have new found respect for you and your situation.
Look, I don't care about if people here yell at me or are triggered but every single post with thoughts I make are with intended consequences.
I am going to say something that may make closet feminists on this page cringe. When I got married to my current wife (not the one who cheated), we agreed my body was mine and hers and hers was hers and mine.
That aside, the way I see this entire argument as going is this since a few of the women posters suggested this
1) Noone claimed that they owned someone else's body
2) Noone was forcing anyone to have 'awesome sex' with them, but simply that they wanted and expected it after forgiving the cheater for their transgressions against their own marriage and against the abused spouse and btw yes, cheating is abuse.
However, everytime we have these threads a couple posters come forward with crap that is related to the above 2.
My opinion is this
1) If someone cheats, they don't deserve the marriage
2) If they are given the gift of reconciliation, they must earn it. Going back to the practices that you employed pre-affair are not enough if you gave the OM/OW more
3) If you love someone the most, you will make sacrifices and do what they want within reason but if you freely gave it to the OM/OW, then it must very well be within reason to give it to your BS who took back your sorry ass.
4) If one is offended by getting asked by the person who they made vows with but broke to do what they did for some stranger POS idiot, then they themselves have the issues that require relinquishing of the marriage.
5) Cheating has consequences. To those cheaters, suck it up and kiss your betrayed's ass. Or just leave and expect that they will hopefully own you in court.
The normal isn't going back and being 'even' and working on both of yourselves because one person was doing what they were supposed to be doing and the other was taking advanatge of that. Sure, after along period in reconciliation, maybe some people can say 'ok we're healed' and all is good. But not right away or within a few years. I would hate the hypocrite who would say that vanilla sex is ok for the BS in reconciliation but a post-nup is deserved. You see, I don't agree mostly in post-nups but I also wouldn't reconcile either. But treatment is critical in R's and a post-nup is ok and all but I better fell for special than the OM and sex is a main way to show it. Because most betrayed spouses were used for their stability and those qualities. The AP was fun. The betrayed spouse should have gotten the fun too and many times in R, they didn't. Look at Poor AO's case (God bless him and I pray for his struggles to end soon)
My view comes from this. 90% of the guys I know get little or no or vanilla sex from their wives. I hear about it every day. If their wife goes out and acts like Veronica Zemanova to another man and he forgives her after she stops, and she goes back to plain vanilla, it is an insult to him and his efforts to R. It's almost like they find us less attractive or unworthy.
I get what you are saying. It has to be when she's ready on on 'her terms' but she is the one who cheated and caused this mess and you could be divorced and having rockstar sex with some young hottie somewhere so while you wait for her, you are again sacrificing. One of my buds got divorced very quickly and before you knew it, he was banging a girlfriend 3 x hotter than his cheating ex-wife. THAT IS NOT ADVOCATING CHEATING, but it does show that the BS actually makes more sacrifices (a potentially more attractive, non-cheating girlfriend over an unloyal, maybe aging and resentful wife) in reconciling by not just staying with an unpredictable cheater but forgoing opportunities too.
Look, in the end, IMO, if they care about us, they wouldn't cheat. If they cheat and still somehow care about us, they would do for us any and everything they did for OM and more.
If I cheated on my wife and ended up towards divorce and she brought me back, I would give in to her very wishes. I would be the last one to say "hey this is my body, don't violate me". I would be thinking (but not saying) "how do you want it and where?" and I would let her command me because I let someone who meant jack squat command me and got off on it.
Fortunately, I am not a cheater and haven't cheated in 49 years.
Again, I love your fire but short of using force (which is illegal and morally reprehensible), the WW/WH better be walking on hot coals to appease, please and give thanks to the person who could have hammered them through a divorce suit which they deserved.
That's my point and I say it bluntly and really don't say it gently.
This was your best line right here from your last post (but not as good as the lines from earlier posts but this paints the picture)
"You have every right to deny anyone sex, including your H. But denying it to him and expecting him to accept it and R; you don't have a right to that, and you don't have a right to complain if he decides to pull the plug over this and tell the world he's a sex crazed maniac. You messed up R, not him, because this is absolutely necessary for many of us to start down the road of getting better."
I would phrase that line but also add that "you gave better sex to the man who should have never been allowed to touch you and that's what you are depriving your husband" and "that's what your BH needs to heal."
I wished more waywards would read this and take it to heart because many don't and it's so accurate.
One last statement. To those who say that you don't want it the same way a WW/WH gave it to the AP, if they did it everyway possible, are you giving up sex for the rest of your lives with the wayward ? Me ? I would strive to be the best.
JMO
[This message edited by Western at 9:41 PM, April 3rd (Tuesday)]