And yet sex was the sacred contract that was not to be broken.
This is one of the things I think about often; particularly when we have threads like this and people say things like "your focused on the wrong thing" (in reference to examining the sexual stuff in an affair). Sex was the thing that broke "the contract". Yes, EA's are a thing, and they hurt terribly I'm sure, but if we go back to "for cause" divorce, AFAIK, an EA wouldn't meet the criteria. Sex is IT, it's really the only thing that separates a marriage from a very close personal friendship. It's the only thing I explicitly promised NOT as a married man. Female friends? Fine (well, not for me, but most people would consider that just fine). A confidant who's female? OK. A little flirting.. Usually OK. "I love yous"? Yes, also OK, I say that to family members (both sexes), and have said it to male friends since being married. It's really sex that is "the thing" in an affair, and, IMHO, it deserves the focus that it gets.
people are becoming more dumb by day
They're not becoming dumber (IMHO, although I can see why you think that!). They are becoming less empathetic, our sense of community is being torn apart and people today are much less "connected" than they were in the past. It's laughably easy to live in a "bubble" today surrounded by only people who are just like you, and who will echo your viewpoints and parrot your statements. Our need for human "connection" has been supplanted/replaced in lots of areas by technology, where before we'd call or go visit, today we "Like" on Facebook and call it "done". Deep/personal relationships have fallen by the wayside in favor of hundreds/thousands of superficial relationships. And you can see that in the dating/sexual marketplace today; we've gone from courtship carefully overseen by parents to people hopping on Tinder and sending "DTF?" to a few random people in the hopes of a totally anonymous hookup. I see countless articles about how technology and our society today is leading to "more connection" and I always laugh at a joke I heard once about Mark Z "More connected says the guy who's probably never met his neighbors, has no idea who lived 2 doors down from him in college and spends his life making sure he's not anywhere where "random" people could actually approach him". Yeah, more connected indeed.
Husband and I, are still parsing out how much of it was about sex
Honestly, and I might get a smack for this, but I think it's pretty safe to make two "in general" assumptions when you're dealing with a lying WS who's motives you're trying to discern. If a male WS tells you "It was about sex", my general thought is "believe him". And if a female WS tells you "It wasn't about sex", again, general though, "believe her". And, in both cases, you're going to have evidence that points the other way. My WW said "it wasn't about sex" and yet, "sex" was basically the only thing they did together. Evidence says "it was about sex" and yet, after many years, I've come to believe her version of the story. And same thing for a WH, millions of TXT messages, "I looovvveeee you's" to the AP, plans to leave the marriage.. All seem to indicate "not about sex" but.. In a lot of cases, all of that is just "window dressing" to get to the sex. NOT all the time, I want to make that clear, men do have affairs and fall in love and there are some women who have affairs "just for sex". But, as a relatively safe "WTF was my WS thinking" I think it's safe to start from those as the "most likely" answers and fill in evidence around that to validate that as a hypothesis.
I don't think OldTruck said A sex is always better. Just that it could be better.
In some A's where the WW is going all out with the AP, doing things they will not do with the BH, it certainly seems like the sex must be better. At least the WW values the A sex more highly than sex with the BH, for whatever reason.
Ahh, the seed of doubt. And, honestly, this is exactly the problem that drives these types of discussions, "it COULD BE" better. It would be a completely false statement to say "Affair sex is never amazing/much better than sex with the BS". 100% false, I can bet my life on it. Especially when, as you point out later, A sex often involves lots of "kink", sometimes kink that's not done at all in the marriage, plus the added excitement and danger.. I feel 100% sure that there are at least some people who's "best sex ever" was with their AP. Not ever AP sucks in bed, in fact, some are probably very gifted (because of experience) in bed. There are plenty of stories out there about married women having their first orgasms with AP's, just like there are plenty of stories out there about married men getting their first BJ/anal sex/etc with an AP. Nobody's gonna convince me that those experiences wouldn't be "amazing" for the WS in those instances. It's usually not that black/white though, and that's what leads to this discussion, because it's really "not clear" if the A sex was better or not. It's a gray area. Better for some, less good for others, and awful for another group. Just like there's a male AP out there with a 6 pack, perfect sized penis, stamina for days with heavenly oral skills, there's also a male AP out there with ED, premature ejaculation, micropenis and a real desire to see how quickly he can get his clothes off and back on. Which did your H/W have? IDK. Nobody really knows. And that's the fundamental problem here. Nearly every WS claims "it wasn't that great" and some of them are lying. Because of that, it becomes difficult to trust anything in this particular area, lots of lying and tons of incentive to continue lying.