What is hard is I love her
Here’s something that may trigger your wife who apparently reads everything posted here:
1. Adultery is emotional and mental abuse
2. Adultery is also physical abuse (it involves putting a faithful partner at risk for life threatening and life changing disease— and even when disease hasn’t been transmitted the genital micro biome has been permanently altered)
3. In almost every other case of abuse toward a spouse (usually a woman) divorce is recommended
Often abused women will say they love their husbands and this is likely true. Yet it’s also true that a physically abused woman shouldn’t remain married to a husband (even if she loves him) when he punches her in the face.
The love for the abusive spouse and the need for divorce are always kept separate in discussions, and yet it’s only in the case of the particular form of abuse called adultery that we seem to get confused on this point. This is similar, by the way, to the very real need to keep discussions of forgiveness separate from whether to D or R. Forgiveness is for you first and foremost and can as easily be accomplished in the midst and after D (and some would argue more quickly) as during R.
Same kind of thing involving whether you love your adulterous spouse. Of course you do. Most faithful spouses love unfaithful spouses. That’s why they are faithful and it’s part and parcel (practically speaking) to being a betrayed spouse.
But loving an unfaithful spouse is almost immaterial to the discussion.
Why so?
Imagine a website called “Surviving Rageaholics” or “Surviving Attempted Murder” or “Surviving Intentional Thievery of Your Home” or “Surviving Being Punched in the Face by Your Husband”
Reconciliation after a woman was punched in the face by an abusive husband would only be recommended with extreme, extreme caution. And I would warrant most therapists would be very hesitant to recommend it, wouldn’t you?
Therapists would say something like “I understand you love your husband and that’s good because it means you are an empathetic person, but the love you feel for him is one thing and his abusive nature and the domestic violence he subjected you to is another thing. Let’s not get them confused.”
And even then they would put major caveats around a possible reconciliation attempt — like “if your abusive husband is visiting the ‘Surviving Being Punched in the Face’ website and policing your threads and trying to control you on that, it doesn’t look like he is remorseful or really trying to work on his abusive tendencies. It may be you need to separate and get yourself to safety.”
Now that’s what would happen, isn’t it?
Would a therapist say “oh but he only punched you in the face once” or “oh but he punched you in the face when you yelled at him” or “oh but he punched you in the face when you were asleep and you only realized it weeks later when he told you about it” or “oh he punched you in the face repeatedly for FOUR YEARS but he seems so contrite now”?
What would the recommendations be for a spouse on such a website? What do you think most people on such a site would be recommending to a woman whose husband had deliberately punched her in the face?
Adultery is the equivalent of rape, taking away a faithful spouse’s autonomy and agency over their own body.
It is at the very least as bad as punching a spouse in the face, and actually a lot worse. I’m sure we can all agree on that.
Draw your own conclusions from this very logical pathway I’ve laid out.
[This message edited by Thumos at 11:31 PM, September 23rd (Wednesday)]