The real question is whether the abuse can stop and the healthy marriage can begin. If not, it's always better for everyone to walk away.
Amen to that. The tricky part is how to know?
I’d rather be cheated on 100 times than have a husband who physically assaults me
I’ve been assaulted by an XBF (hell, he once shot at me and I’ll never forget the sound of a bullet passing about 10” from my ear). That was a cake walk compared to the trauma of being cheated on. There are plenty of BS who were also rape victims, and we often hear that dday was worse. I dunno. Seems like I’m taking the bait of comparing and that doesn’t sit right. Personally, I’d much rather my WH had hit me the day he decided to drop his pants. I’d have more than a decade of my life back.
This is one of the points I think Thumos is trying to make - abuse and infidelity go hand and hand. They are not separate entities that deserve treatment as if they have very little to do with each other. We don't need to be telling BSes their pain is self absorbed if they compare it to another form of abuse because IME, they are comparable. As I said, I have found that the feelings I've experienced from various forms of abuse and rape to be on par with some of the feelings other BSes feel. I don't think that's a coincidence.
Me either – and that was one heckuva post Neko – I’d already written my stuff out when I read it (and went ahead & posted), but kudos for also bringing in the vast amount of support available to those who experience physical/sexual assault…. but for a BS? crickets.
Punching someone in the face or emotionally abusing them is done with the intent to inflict pain/harm. Usually that is done for purposes of controlling that person.
The LIES that go along with an A ARE controlling. In addition to my own history, I've known a fair amount of physically abused spouses (and abusers, for that matter) and I honestly don’t see any difference. The punching is often in response to some sort of feeling in the abuser who does not have the “COPING SKILLS” to address (sound familiar? ). Batterers don’t necessarily intend the physical harm they actually inflict, either. IOW, the intent between cheaters & batterers may not be such a dividing line. Both abusers have a feeling or a void or an urge that they cannot or will not control – they “act out” as a way to cope with uncomfortable emotions. Obviously some batterers do intend to beat the crap out of their victims, just as some As are a way to “get back” at a BS for some perceived slight against the WS. Even if an A is a “secret” form of dominance, there IS dominance and often an INTENT to have that kind of dominance & control over the BS – I just don’t think most WS can ever admit that to themselves, but we see it ALL THE TIME with the blameshifting that goes on after dday. Hell, we hear from rapists all the damn time that they didn’t think they were doing anything “wrong” to the victim, they didn’t think they were “harming” the victim, that they didn’t INTEND to harm the victim. I think both battering & infidelity stem from VERY similar things intent or lack thereof is a red herring.
And FWIW, the manslaughter v murder is also a red herring. If intent is the standard, then why do we prosecute folks who burgled my home? They didn’t INTEND to hurt me – only to steal my stuff. They KNOW it’s wrong, and they did it anyhow and I was harmed (and that harm is not solely financial – anyone who’s been burgled knows how creepy it is. And I lost more than the value of what was stolen – who puts a price on their grandfather’s watch? Or the “costs” involved with comforting your young children who lost a sense of safety in their home?). Now, our legal system says that our society cares a LOT about $ (and we do- as infidelity is a fraud upon a M, but lacks ability in all but a handful of states to seek redress about…. but if the fraud involves depriving someone of their $$$, our legal system is all in for that),but not so much about non economic harm (and- TRIGGER WARNING- rape is also a good example here – we prosecute rape bc it is abuse and creates tremendous emotional harm. So – why do we prosecute rape for a victim that is passed out? What if that victim doesn’t even have so much as a paper cut as to physical injury? The rapist didn’t INTEND to harm the victim, who was just incapable of consent and basically slept through the whole thing?)
At the end of the day, I think adultery lurking in the shadows may be the worst part of it. Not only vis-à-vis the lies to the BS, but the broader secrecy that exists in our culture/society. IOW, if the BS of the world got together and shone a giant and public light on the issue, I do believe change can happen (tho it could only be via the “stick” of legal action or social shunning vs a preferable “carrot” approach of looking at M differently).
One of the first places to start is divorce and AP laws. Most states have – relatively recently – done completely away with the ability to sue an AP. If I could sue my WH’s POSOW, I would do it in a heartbeat (she’s far wealthier than I’ll ever be and while my WH may have raped me, she absolutely helped hold me down while he did it). In the context of D, the theory of “no fault” has, IMHO, taken quite a skewed turn. No fault came about for good reason – that folks should be able to D w/o having a legal “reason”. And I agree with that. The problem is that it’s become warped to basically preclude the courts from even considering the fault for the demise of the M… most states won’t allow a court to even consider non-physical “bad” conduct during the M (and even the physical can be shaky in some states). I thought this was bad policy long before my own dday. Basically, if someone causes their spouse trauma / PTSD due to the “abuse” of infidelity, that should absolutely be considered when dividing assets (and as to measuring emotional harm - just make it be a per se injury... we will ASSUME you are harmed, based upon the research - like we already do with rape). It should also tip the scales (all things being equal) on custody & child support. For the life of me I cannot understand how the legal policy of forcing a stay at home BS to leave their kids, get a job, disrupt EVERYONE’S lives solely bc s/he was abused by the WS via cheating.
I drive a fair amount for my (soon to be former) job, and if I had a $1 for every time I’ve contemplated putting up a billboard that says “adultery is abuse” with a picture of a woman with a beat up face, I’d be a rich woman. I have such deep respect for folks like Peggy Vaughan who came forward with her personal story to educate folks. The problem is that the current level of “education” is run by therapists who make $ off their books and programs (and ONLY 'after the fact'' ). It's not like an army of BS who can speak their personal truths and educate the public about the harm they experienced, the HARD EFFING WORK it is to get back on your feet, and the fact that it is abusive to live a secret sexual life (which is how physical abuse and rape laws were changed). The stigma of shame to the BS and the conventional wisdom that WS only cheat bc of some flaw in the BS or problem in the M remains PERVASIVE (hell, that was ME before dday). And, of course, there is the romanticizing of it all aspects of our culture (eg, why isn't there a call to boycott Amazon bc of Bezos? Or to send Kristen Stewart's career into the toilet by boycotting her "acting" after her A? Why is Alicia Keyes viewed as some great emotional songstress despite her sleeping with a MM?)
We have public service commercials about everything under the sun (bullying, the environment, being “kind”, racial equality, pet adoption, etc)…. why isn’t there a “the more you know” on cheating? I’d just LOVE to see that one play during say, the Superbowl.
Yet – the changes in views about adultery, the increasingly common thought that it causes PTSD, and the long term damage associated (to the BS, to the kids, to the standard of living, etc) is NEVER even mentioned on TV, or in the halls of state capitols or the training given to divorce judges. They don’t want to hear it (likely bc a significant # of them are also WS).
All I needed to do was think "how would I feel if he did this to me" and there you are, decision made to not do this. Empathy. If a person doesn't have that, they're pretty freakin' dangerous to you on a number of levels.
Me too.
WH said he thought you'd never find out so he did think of you, he just felt the risk was worth the reward.
Same here. The only “reflection” my WH says he did before moving from EA to PA in his LTA is a “risk analysis” of getting caught.
[This message edited by gmc94 at 5:38 PM, September 30th, 2020 (Wednesday)]