I intended to respond earlier but there was a snowstorm and my eldest’s daycare was closed today so I’m working from home with a toddler today. I also had to zoom with the GP about the baby’s exema, go pickup prescriptions from the pharmacy (cream for said exema, and my husband needed more allergy meds). While I was in the neighbourhood I grabbed a few ingredients for dinner. You know, standard second shift stuff...
Pre-publish edit: UGHHHHH and now I see you’ve made huge changes to your page 8 response to me, and in particular the explanation for "over-educated female" bit, even since I started writing this this afternoon, and I will respect that (your original words had me fired up last night). I have the time or energy to change ALL of this though so (with a few edits) this is what you’re getting……
So here is the thing, this isn’t the only message board I participate on. I am also intermittently active on a board for expectant/new parents - overwhelmingly mothers. Obviously there is a lot of talk about diapers, breastfeeding/pumping, sleep schedules, post-partum depression/anxiety, childcare issues, adjustment to motherhood (yes, things like the loss of identity) and the unrelenting, (often overwhelmingly) mundane drudgery of this new life (note: I assume that this is what Cheerio dust is intended to symbolize in the article). No matter how wanted, planned, and loved a child is, nothing truly prepares you for all of that (man or woman).
In light of the above, a lot of relationship issues show up on this parenting board too. An enormous number of women (myself included) struggle while adapting to the changes to their relationships that inevitably occur once babies are added to the mix (I will note from my own experience that dynamics can change with each additional child). Maybe it’s lack of sleep, maybe it’s hormones, maybe its a disconnect between expectation and reality, but resentment of ones spouse is common – even when that spouse is mostly "good" (many are not). Some marriages are able to withstand the enormous changes that having children bring – some are not. I have NEVER seen someone contemplate separation or divorce blithely. Too often I see women in what I would consider to be unlivable situations trying to "work things out" for the sake of their child (before Linus jumps in because I know he will, I do not suggest that men do not also make pretty terrible sacrifices for their families).
A staggering (and heartbreaking) number of women experience/discover infidelity during pregnancy or when their child(ren) are very young – obviously experiencing this kind of trauma in these circumstances is a special sort of awful. Lately I’ve done a lot of my JFO "triage work" there. I invariably recommend that those women come here for support. Sometimes – certainly not often - I see them post in JFO. I imagine others lurking in the background, like I did, wondering if this is a safe space for them. Whether they (or others) are participating in these conversations, they are reading. I am protective of those women.
In reading this thread, whether people read the article or not, people (especially women) are going to hear that divorce, especially with young children, is selfish and wrong. That it is giving up. That it is worthy of judgment and condemnation. That any unhappiness they have in their marriage, if it doesn’t include beating or cheating, is a frivolous, selfish problem. Or, if they have already chosen to divorce (as others have chimed in) and NOT chosen to air their dirty laundry far and wide, that everyone around them has also passed that judgment. That’s a lot. That’s the kind of thing that keeps people in bad situations. I have read many of your posts – I don’t think that’s what you are going for. I think we should be more careful about judging people’s parenting.
There are a lot of voices here. Some are louder than others. That can be incredibly intimidating to someone new here. It can be silencing. Thumos, it will not surprise anyone if I suggest that you are one those loud voices. I’ve said this to you before, but rightly or wrongly, that means people will listen. Sometimes that is a really great thing. Your perspective has undoubtedly helped many people here. I’ve seen you give great advice. HOW you speak matters though. It has been suggested you tone down the hyperbole. I have pointed out (and provided examples) of comments that come across to me as misogynistic and instead of taking that on, you’ve questioned reality and suggested that I’m imagining it (remind me, what’s that argument tactic called again?).
[Before I let this go, because I know I should, I would like to point out that I am not the one raising patriarchy and empowerment and feminism. Neither is Ms. Jones (I have already pointed out she brings up the patriarchy in passing as an interest vs. blaming it for her unhappiness). I simply don’t see where she is connecting the dissolution of her family to the "empowerment narrative". I don't see her suggesting she is some sort of feminist icon/example - I certainly never said she was. YOU are the one who seems to keep raising it and are bothered by it.]
Anyhow… that’s my feedback . You can take it or leave it. I urge you to at least consider it. Moving on….
Alright, so we disagree on our initial impressions/interpretation of an article - honestly, not a big deal (interesting, but nbd). Although I identify/empathize with Ms. Jones’ struggle to find herself as a new mother, I don’t have a position on her decision to leave her marriage. As indicated, she doesn’t give much information and it’s none of my business anyway. If there is one thing I’ve learned from participating here it’s that everyone’s marriages are different and they get to decide what they are and are not willing to accept in their relationship. Despite the number of posts I’ve made on this topic, I don’t have any skin in this game. The thing is, neither do you…. Right?
Why then, does this particular article bother you SO DEEPLY. Seriously, the amount of vitriol (or snark, again I see you’ve edited a bit) for this author is typically reserved for (other people’s) wayward wives. What is it about this article is hitting a nerve for you? Why did you decide to share it here when it seemingly has nothing to do with infidelity? Why do you connect it? You chose to post in general vs. off-topic. Someone else suggested its because its about vow breaking. That makes sense I suppose, but I’m not sure you endorsed that point (again I could be wrong). You corrected me when I thought you were suggesting she was a wayward. Is the issue women being unhappy/blowing up marriages without "good reason"? I think the conversation could be more focused if you explained the connection a bit better.