5 & 6 Have no idea what you mean by preselected and status. Clarify please?
Preselection is the idea that a woman believes other women may want the man, that he is valued by others, and often "selected" by some group as a desirable person. He's verified by the community, wide or small. A rock star is the oft used simple example, ideologized and desired making him preselected. Women weren't banging Mick Jagger backstage at the drop of a hat for his intelligence, humor, or anything else. It's not important that he earned being a rock star, what's important is other women believe him a desirable person. Men tend not care much about preselection, if some woman is not desirable, it doesn't matter if your buddy think's she's hot, she's not getting one bit hotter to the man that doesn't find her desirable.
Status is just that, and I'd be surprised any adult exists that doesn't see the hierarchies humans form everywhere around them. If someone is at or near the top of a particular hierarchy, they have status. This is independent of being preselected, this is a position they have earned, professor, etc. Women find this attractive, again men tend not to care.
I don't know about being red pill'd, I suppose I'm unabashedly traditional. That list I took isn't oppressing anyone, it's not a statement that any women is being forced conform, it simply adheres to both my observation of women's choices and the culmination of surveys and data I've seen over my life. Other than my own boys, I could care less about how other men choose to mate select. The whole world of males is not my community. Anyway why shouldn't women be attracted to a hot, tall, wealthy, confident male? Those are positive traits that indicate many positives outcomes for women, good looking children, security, protection.
That said, the list was a counterpoint I saw to a study suggesting women are attracted to these qualities:
1. Smart
2. Makes You Laugh
3. Supports Your Career
4. Makes Effort with Friends and Family
5. Emotionally Intelligent
6. Respects Your Opinions
7. Celebrates your Achievements
9. Shares your Values
It's not that the list is inherently wrong. Many women may value those things, but that's not attraction. Women almost never choose men shorter than themselves, they almost never choose men older, they rarely choose men who earn less, etc., etc. The omission is too glaring to ignore, it's a kind of lie of omission. It reads like a message women are sending to make themselves appear more value oriented and is simply not based on their choices. I'm sure this thread is full of the unicorns, great, good for all of the women that have risen above selecting men for safety, security, and good looking children. Sarcasm aside, I wonder sometimes if BS are less selfish as a group and more value oriented, but that's a whole different topic.
My point wasn't to box any woman in, you do you. My assertion was that most men see this incongruity in the way women behave and what they say. And in the case of a BS they may see this lifetime of incongruity being played out real time in the WW AP selection. If one feels they are selected based on say, wealth, but use to feel they were selected for a wide range of attributes (including perhaps sexual attraction). This feeling is not good for a healthy marriage, shouldn't it be addressed?
This is just conversation for me, I don't have an ideological ax to grind. In fact, I can't make sense of my own WW's decisions, so making sense of someone else's WW is hubris.